Adaptability as a multi-scale strategy for the regeneration of the built environment through circular economy perspective

Cristiana Cellucci
{"title":"Adaptability as a multi-scale strategy for the regeneration of the built\n environment through circular economy perspective","authors":"Cristiana Cellucci","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1004112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since its founding documents, sustainability has recognized collective\n well-being and environmental protection as the key to the development of\n society and, at the same time, the main challenge in the relationships\n between human activities and the limited capacity of ecosystems to support\n them. For a long time, it was believed that natural and anthropic systems\n responded to perturbations gradually through a slow adaptive process. Today,\n we know that vulnerability (economic, social, environmental and health)\n projects us into a condition of sudden discontinuity, unpredictable and\n uncontrollable immersive events, in which every single fragility is related\n to the \"whole\" and every single action produces an eco or a cascading effect\n on the well-being of users and the health of the planet. The global crisis\n scenarios, the conditions of uncertainty and reality complexity, the limited\n resources and the variability of the framework of the needs show the failure\n of a \"rigid\" conception-organization of the built environment often forced\n to reorganize itself as a result of stressful events for reach acceptable\n levels of efficiency or to show its fragility (seismic, hydro-geological,\n climatic, social) by undermining the concepts of stability (environmental,\n economic and social security) we are used to. Precisely in urban areas, a\n context in which human health-planetary health relationships express their\n effects more than elsewhere, it is necessary to intercept new solutions and\n rules to deal with the direct consequences (deterioration of surface\n materials, structures, reduction of energy performance) and indirect (loss\n of identity, interruption of socio-economic activities, loss of livability\n and conditions of well-being) of climate change on urban centres. Although\n the literature recognizes the need for impact forecasting tools, it appears\n increasingly important to support strategies aimed at increasing\n adaptability understood as a characteristic of the designed system that\n allows its transformation/modification, increasing its performance qualities\n and its life span useful. In this sense, adaptability is one of the\n fundamental requisites for a holistic-circular regeneration and\n redevelopment of neighbourhoods and architectures, conceived as products\n that are not \"disposable\" but \"error-friendliness\" or \"prone to error\" and\n structured to \"regenerate\" following damage or decompensation through\n actions of transformation, repair, maintenance, reuse, reconditioning, etc.A\n paradigm shift is needed in the interpretation of adaptive intervention as a\n \"regenerative process\", understood not only as a solution for the\n restoration/maintenance of acceptable performance conditions - in a linear\n vision of the life cycle of the designed system - but a moment of \"reset\n /restart\" in which the action (of transformability, maintainability,\n replaceability, reversibility, mitigation/compensation, etc.) underlies a\n set of strategies structured in a circular process (Refuse, Rethink, Reduce,\n Re-use, Repair, Refurbish, Remanufacture, Repurpose, Recycle, Recover). In\n this sense, interventions on the built environment constitute an opportunity\n to lead cities towards an ecological transition, if considered both as\n adaptive actions of external (environmental, social and economic) and\n internal vulnerabilities (variability linked to user needs) but also as\n interferences (of circular micro processes) to the linear process with which\n cities have been conceived and evolved, to constitute a step towards the\n creation of a potentially regenerative and resilient built environment. The\n paper is part of a study on the topic of sustainable regeneration and\n redevelopment of existing buildings and urban areas. It explores the\n implications between the need for adaptive regeneration to ensure both the\n adequate levels of performance and functionality of the space (indoor,\n outdoor space ) with its components/materials and the equally urgent need to\n conceive such adaptive actions in a circular way. The collection, review and\n systematization of the literature and case studies led to the identification\n of a framework of adaptive/circular strategies at the micro (the single\n component), meso (the building) and macro (the public space) scales. The\n strategies were then validated in three social housing districts in three\n Italian cities.","PeriodicalId":231376,"journal":{"name":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since its founding documents, sustainability has recognized collective well-being and environmental protection as the key to the development of society and, at the same time, the main challenge in the relationships between human activities and the limited capacity of ecosystems to support them. For a long time, it was believed that natural and anthropic systems responded to perturbations gradually through a slow adaptive process. Today, we know that vulnerability (economic, social, environmental and health) projects us into a condition of sudden discontinuity, unpredictable and uncontrollable immersive events, in which every single fragility is related to the "whole" and every single action produces an eco or a cascading effect on the well-being of users and the health of the planet. The global crisis scenarios, the conditions of uncertainty and reality complexity, the limited resources and the variability of the framework of the needs show the failure of a "rigid" conception-organization of the built environment often forced to reorganize itself as a result of stressful events for reach acceptable levels of efficiency or to show its fragility (seismic, hydro-geological, climatic, social) by undermining the concepts of stability (environmental, economic and social security) we are used to. Precisely in urban areas, a context in which human health-planetary health relationships express their effects more than elsewhere, it is necessary to intercept new solutions and rules to deal with the direct consequences (deterioration of surface materials, structures, reduction of energy performance) and indirect (loss of identity, interruption of socio-economic activities, loss of livability and conditions of well-being) of climate change on urban centres. Although the literature recognizes the need for impact forecasting tools, it appears increasingly important to support strategies aimed at increasing adaptability understood as a characteristic of the designed system that allows its transformation/modification, increasing its performance qualities and its life span useful. In this sense, adaptability is one of the fundamental requisites for a holistic-circular regeneration and redevelopment of neighbourhoods and architectures, conceived as products that are not "disposable" but "error-friendliness" or "prone to error" and structured to "regenerate" following damage or decompensation through actions of transformation, repair, maintenance, reuse, reconditioning, etc.A paradigm shift is needed in the interpretation of adaptive intervention as a "regenerative process", understood not only as a solution for the restoration/maintenance of acceptable performance conditions - in a linear vision of the life cycle of the designed system - but a moment of "reset /restart" in which the action (of transformability, maintainability, replaceability, reversibility, mitigation/compensation, etc.) underlies a set of strategies structured in a circular process (Refuse, Rethink, Reduce, Re-use, Repair, Refurbish, Remanufacture, Repurpose, Recycle, Recover). In this sense, interventions on the built environment constitute an opportunity to lead cities towards an ecological transition, if considered both as adaptive actions of external (environmental, social and economic) and internal vulnerabilities (variability linked to user needs) but also as interferences (of circular micro processes) to the linear process with which cities have been conceived and evolved, to constitute a step towards the creation of a potentially regenerative and resilient built environment. The paper is part of a study on the topic of sustainable regeneration and redevelopment of existing buildings and urban areas. It explores the implications between the need for adaptive regeneration to ensure both the adequate levels of performance and functionality of the space (indoor, outdoor space ) with its components/materials and the equally urgent need to conceive such adaptive actions in a circular way. The collection, review and systematization of the literature and case studies led to the identification of a framework of adaptive/circular strategies at the micro (the single component), meso (the building) and macro (the public space) scales. The strategies were then validated in three social housing districts in three Italian cities.
循环经济视角下建筑环境再生的多尺度适应性策略
自其创始文件以来,可持续性已认识到集体福祉和环境保护是社会发展的关键,同时也是人类活动与生态系统支持人类活动的有限能力之间关系的主要挑战。长期以来,人们认为自然系统和人为系统通过一个缓慢的适应过程逐渐对扰动作出反应。今天,我们知道,脆弱性(经济、社会、环境和健康)将我们投射到一个突然中断、不可预测和无法控制的沉浸式事件的条件下,其中每一个脆弱性都与“整体”相关,每一个行动都会对用户的福祉和地球的健康产生生态或连锁效应。全球危机情景、不确定的条件和现实的复杂性、有限的资源和需求框架的可变性表明了“刚性”概念的失败——建筑环境的组织往往由于压力事件而被迫重新组织自己,以达到可接受的效率水平,或者通过破坏稳定的概念(环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境、环境和环境)来显示其脆弱性(地震、水文地质、气候、社会)。经济和社会保障)我们已经习惯了。正是在城市地区,人类健康-地球健康关系的影响比其他地方表现得更明显,因此有必要制定新的解决办法和规则,以应对气候变化对城市中心的直接后果(表面材料、结构恶化、能源绩效下降)和间接后果(特征丧失、社会经济活动中断、宜居性和福祉条件丧失)。虽然文献认识到需要影响预测工具,但支持旨在增加适应性的策略似乎越来越重要,这种适应性被理解为设计系统的特征,允许其转换/修改,增加其性能质量和有用的寿命。从这个意义上说,适应性是社区和建筑的整体循环再生和再开发的基本条件之一,被视为不是“一次性”的产品,而是“错误友好”或“容易出错”的产品,并且可以通过转换、维修、维护、再利用、修复等行动来“再生”损坏或补偿。etc.A范式转变需要适应干预的解释“再生过程”,理解不仅作为恢复的解决方案/维护可接受的性能条件——在一个线性的设计系统的生命周期,但片刻的“重置/重启”行动(可变换性、可维护性、可替换性、可逆性、缓解/补偿,等等)是一组策略结构在一个循环过程(拒绝,重新思考,减少,再利用,修理,翻新,再制造,再利用,再循环,回收)。从这个意义上说,对建筑环境的干预构成了一个引导城市走向生态转型的机会,如果将其视为外部(环境、社会和经济)和内部脆弱性(与用户需求相关的可变性)的适应性行动,同时也视为对城市被构想和发展的线性过程的干扰(循环微过程)。为创造可再生和有弹性的建筑环境迈出了一步。这篇论文是一项关于现有建筑和城市地区可持续再生和再开发的研究的一部分。它探讨了适应性再生的需求之间的含义,以确保空间(室内和室外空间)及其组件/材料的性能和功能的适当水平,以及同样迫切需要以循环的方式构思这种适应性行动。通过对文献和案例研究的收集、回顾和系统化,确定了微观(单个构件)、中观(建筑)和宏观(公共空间)尺度上的适应性/循环策略框架。这些策略随后在意大利三个城市的三个社会住房区进行了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信