Differential Attainment in Career Progression for Doctors in the UK

Veena Daga, R. Blizzard, A. Dhelaria, S. Hosdurga, S. Hussein, S. Madabhushi, Geraldine Sawney, Arvind Shah, L. Theocharidou, Rupal Shah
{"title":"Differential Attainment in Career Progression for Doctors in the UK","authors":"Veena Daga, R. Blizzard, A. Dhelaria, S. Hosdurga, S. Hussein, S. Madabhushi, Geraldine Sawney, Arvind Shah, L. Theocharidou, Rupal Shah","doi":"10.38192/14.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differential attainment in career progression in the NHS is a complex issue with many interplaying factors apart from individual protected characteristics. In this paper, we examine the attainment gap, causes for these disparities and some recommendations to reduce the gap. \nOur review shows that there is significant DA between groups of doctors on the basis of gender, ethnicity, race and country of primary medical qualification. The likely causes are bias, lack of opportunity, poor supervision, mentorship, sponsorship, dichotomous treatment of doctors based on training or non-training status and cultural exclusion. Data is not monitored or reported and there is little organisational accountability. Solutions are likely to include transparent data on recruitment as well as progression for benchmarking, training support for all doctors, initiatives which are sensitive to gender, parental responsibility, cultural heritage, language and robust supervision including mentorship and sponsorship. \nThis scoping review forms part of the Alliance for Equality in Healthcare Professions project on Differential Attainment chaired by the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (BAPIO) and will be integrated into the Bridging the Gap project undertaken by BAPIO Institute for Health Research (BIHR). This work is part of six domains of doctors' careers in the NHS.","PeriodicalId":365463,"journal":{"name":"Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinion","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38192/14.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Differential attainment in career progression in the NHS is a complex issue with many interplaying factors apart from individual protected characteristics. In this paper, we examine the attainment gap, causes for these disparities and some recommendations to reduce the gap. Our review shows that there is significant DA between groups of doctors on the basis of gender, ethnicity, race and country of primary medical qualification. The likely causes are bias, lack of opportunity, poor supervision, mentorship, sponsorship, dichotomous treatment of doctors based on training or non-training status and cultural exclusion. Data is not monitored or reported and there is little organisational accountability. Solutions are likely to include transparent data on recruitment as well as progression for benchmarking, training support for all doctors, initiatives which are sensitive to gender, parental responsibility, cultural heritage, language and robust supervision including mentorship and sponsorship. This scoping review forms part of the Alliance for Equality in Healthcare Professions project on Differential Attainment chaired by the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (BAPIO) and will be integrated into the Bridging the Gap project undertaken by BAPIO Institute for Health Research (BIHR). This work is part of six domains of doctors' careers in the NHS.
英国医生职业发展中的差异成就
国民保健制度职业发展的差异成就是一个复杂的问题,除了个人受保护的特点外,还有许多相互作用的因素。在本文中,我们研究了成绩差距,这些差距的原因和一些建议,以减少差距。我们的回顾显示,基于性别、民族、种族和初级医疗资格国家的医生群体之间存在显著的DA。可能的原因是偏见、缺乏机会、监督不力、指导、赞助、基于培训或非培训身份的医生的二分对待以及文化排斥。数据不受监控或报告,也几乎没有组织问责制。解决方案可能包括透明的招聘数据以及基准的进展、对所有医生的培训支持、对性别、父母责任、文化遗产、语言敏感的举措以及包括指导和赞助在内的强有力的监督。这一范围审查是由印度裔英国医生协会(BAPIO)主持的保健专业平等联盟差别成就项目的一部分,并将纳入由BAPIO健康研究所(BIHR)承担的弥合差距项目。这项工作是NHS医生职业生涯的六个领域的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信