Building a Single Market for Sustainable Finance in the EU- Idealism, Policy and Mixed Messages

I. Chiu
{"title":"Building a Single Market for Sustainable Finance in the EU- Idealism, Policy and Mixed Messages","authors":"I. Chiu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3631946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the European Commission adopted an action plan for promoting sustainable finance in 2018, legislative reform has been introduced for enhanced market building in sustainable finance products as well as to harmonize the regulative standards for them. Regulation is intended to mobilize the mainstream investment fund sector to develop and provide choice in their offers of sustainable financial products, hence it can be regarded as enabling in nature. It is also in the nature of harmonized European regulation to provide for sufficiently high-quality regulative and protective standards so that market development is carried out in a manner that inspires market confidence. This is consistent with the ordoliberal underpinnings of single market regulatory measures in the financial sector. However, regulative standards tend towards high-quality in order to underpin market credibility, but they may sometimes be counterproductive if ‘idealism’ becomes too demanding. <br><br>This article examines the Regulation on sustainability disclosures required of the financial services sector and the Taxonomy Regulation in their roles to make sustainable finance products widely marketised by the mainstream investment funds sector. It examines the finely balanced nature of the EU’s governance of sustainable finance as its enabling elements and regulative ones interact. We argue that the net result is mixed messages to the market which may not lead to significant development in market structures and product choice. We further interrogate a lacuna in law that investment advice is not adequately regulated in relation to sustainable financial product offerings.","PeriodicalId":245985,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Institutions in Markets (Topic)","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Institutions in Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3631946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since the European Commission adopted an action plan for promoting sustainable finance in 2018, legislative reform has been introduced for enhanced market building in sustainable finance products as well as to harmonize the regulative standards for them. Regulation is intended to mobilize the mainstream investment fund sector to develop and provide choice in their offers of sustainable financial products, hence it can be regarded as enabling in nature. It is also in the nature of harmonized European regulation to provide for sufficiently high-quality regulative and protective standards so that market development is carried out in a manner that inspires market confidence. This is consistent with the ordoliberal underpinnings of single market regulatory measures in the financial sector. However, regulative standards tend towards high-quality in order to underpin market credibility, but they may sometimes be counterproductive if ‘idealism’ becomes too demanding.

This article examines the Regulation on sustainability disclosures required of the financial services sector and the Taxonomy Regulation in their roles to make sustainable finance products widely marketised by the mainstream investment funds sector. It examines the finely balanced nature of the EU’s governance of sustainable finance as its enabling elements and regulative ones interact. We argue that the net result is mixed messages to the market which may not lead to significant development in market structures and product choice. We further interrogate a lacuna in law that investment advice is not adequately regulated in relation to sustainable financial product offerings.
在欧盟建立可持续金融的单一市场——理想主义、政策和混合信息
自2018年欧盟委员会通过促进可持续金融行动计划以来,欧盟已经进行了立法改革,以加强可持续金融产品的市场建设,并协调其监管标准。监管旨在动员主流投资基金部门开发和提供可持续金融产品的选择,因此它可以被视为本质上的扶持。统一的欧洲条例的性质还包括规定足够高质量的管制和保护标准,以便以激发市场信心的方式进行市场发展。这与金融部门单一市场监管措施的自由主义基础是一致的。然而,为了巩固市场信誉,监管标准倾向于高质量,但如果“理想主义”变得过于苛刻,它们有时可能会适得其反。本文考察了金融服务行业可持续性信息披露法规和分类法规在可持续金融产品被主流投资基金业广泛市场化中的作用。它考察了欧盟可持续金融治理的微妙平衡性质,因为它的支持因素和监管因素相互作用。我们认为,最终的结果是向市场传递混杂的信息,这可能不会导致市场结构和产品选择的重大发展。我们进一步调查了法律上的空白,即投资建议在可持续金融产品提供方面没有得到充分监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信