1. Setting the Scene

S. Parr, J. Duchan, C. Pound
{"title":"1. Setting the Scene","authors":"S. Parr, J. Duchan, C. Pound","doi":"10.1515/9789048540969-004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Overview The thesis is based on the argument that we know little about the process of design as it occurs within a real world context, and as a consequence have little understanding about how to provide technology to support it. We therefore need better ways to conceptualise design activity within its context of action. To bridge this gap in our understanding, the research in this thesis attempts to examine the mechanisms used to coordinate the work of engineering designers in the construction industry. This information is used to develop novel technologies that are appropriate to the needs and concerns of design workers in the domain, and is expanded to cover the larger area of design in general. A study of engineering design work in situ was performed and this was analysed within a framework based on the information processing metaphor of cognitive science. The results of the work demonstrate that design behaviour does not involve a simple mapping of problem onto solution as claimed by current research in cognitive science. Instead, behaviour results from the complex and interdependent interactions-of the organisational relationships between design workers, between individuals and artefacts, and between the individuals and their context of action. These interactions are crucial in determining the final outcome of the design process. The understandings about engineering design generated through the study do not supplant current the understanding of design, but augments it by specifying the design process at a systems level, rather than at an individual level. This approach to the study of design is important in developing technology to support design work because it removes the emphasis on tools for problem solving by individuals and reassigns it towards tools to support human communication. For the technology to augment the design process, tools developed for communication must be integrated with the procedures involved in the organisation of work, the social protocols that the design workers use to manage informal communications, and the other artefacts that they use. This is achieved by detailing and making explicit the resources and constraints available to design workers in the construction industry. The results of the study allow technology developers an insight into the collaborative design process, Distributed cognition and computer supported collaborative design. 1 Introduction-the road ahead demonstrating where (and on occasions, where not) technologies could be introduced to design work. Historically, the thesis was intended to examine the role of models in the creation …","PeriodicalId":396965,"journal":{"name":"Writing Japan's War in New Guinea","volume":"274 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Writing Japan's War in New Guinea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048540969-004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Overview The thesis is based on the argument that we know little about the process of design as it occurs within a real world context, and as a consequence have little understanding about how to provide technology to support it. We therefore need better ways to conceptualise design activity within its context of action. To bridge this gap in our understanding, the research in this thesis attempts to examine the mechanisms used to coordinate the work of engineering designers in the construction industry. This information is used to develop novel technologies that are appropriate to the needs and concerns of design workers in the domain, and is expanded to cover the larger area of design in general. A study of engineering design work in situ was performed and this was analysed within a framework based on the information processing metaphor of cognitive science. The results of the work demonstrate that design behaviour does not involve a simple mapping of problem onto solution as claimed by current research in cognitive science. Instead, behaviour results from the complex and interdependent interactions-of the organisational relationships between design workers, between individuals and artefacts, and between the individuals and their context of action. These interactions are crucial in determining the final outcome of the design process. The understandings about engineering design generated through the study do not supplant current the understanding of design, but augments it by specifying the design process at a systems level, rather than at an individual level. This approach to the study of design is important in developing technology to support design work because it removes the emphasis on tools for problem solving by individuals and reassigns it towards tools to support human communication. For the technology to augment the design process, tools developed for communication must be integrated with the procedures involved in the organisation of work, the social protocols that the design workers use to manage informal communications, and the other artefacts that they use. This is achieved by detailing and making explicit the resources and constraints available to design workers in the construction industry. The results of the study allow technology developers an insight into the collaborative design process, Distributed cognition and computer supported collaborative design. 1 Introduction-the road ahead demonstrating where (and on occasions, where not) technologies could be introduced to design work. Historically, the thesis was intended to examine the role of models in the creation …
1. 场景设置
这篇论文是基于这样的论点,即我们对设计过程知之甚少,因为它发生在现实世界的背景下,因此对如何提供技术来支持它几乎没有了解。因此,我们需要更好的方法来将设计活动概念化。为了弥合我们理解上的这一差距,本文的研究试图考察用于协调建筑行业工程设计师工作的机制。这些信息用于开发适合该领域设计工作者的需求和关注的新技术,并扩展到一般设计的更大领域。对现场工程设计工作进行了研究,并在基于认知科学的信息处理隐喻的框架内进行了分析。这项工作的结果表明,设计行为并不像当前认知科学研究所声称的那样,涉及到一个简单的问题到解决方案的映射。相反,行为源于复杂和相互依赖的相互作用——设计工作者之间的组织关系,个人和人工制品之间的关系,以及个人和他们的行动环境之间的关系。这些互动对于决定设计过程的最终结果至关重要。通过研究产生的对工程设计的理解不会取代当前对设计的理解,而是通过在系统层面而不是在个人层面上指定设计过程来增强对设计的理解。这种研究设计的方法对于开发支持设计工作的技术非常重要,因为它消除了对个人解决问题的工具的强调,并将其重新分配给支持人类交流的工具。为了增强设计过程的技术,为交流而开发的工具必须与工作组织所涉及的程序、设计工作者用来管理非正式交流的社会协议以及他们使用的其他人工制品相结合。这是通过详细说明和明确建筑行业设计人员可用的资源和限制来实现的。研究结果使技术开发人员能够深入了解协同设计过程、分布式认知和计算机支持的协同设计。1 .引入——前面的道路展示了在什么情况下(以及在什么情况下)可以将技术引入设计工作。从历史上看,这篇论文的目的是研究模特在创作中的作用……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信