H. Lucas
{"title":"Ethical dilemmas in research quality assurance","authors":"H. Lucas","doi":"10.1002/QAJ.344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay three examples of ethical dilemmas in research quality assurance are presented. For one of the examples, dealing with the use of placebo control groups in bio-medical research on humans, the balance between ethical and scientific considerations will be evaluated on basis of a critical review of the applicable standards and/or regulations, such as the Declaration of Helsinki and the current Good Clinical Practice (GCP) regulations. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.","PeriodicalId":147931,"journal":{"name":"Quality Assurance Journal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Assurance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/QAJ.344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
研究质量保证中的伦理困境
在这篇文章中,提出了三个研究质量保证中的伦理困境的例子。例如,处理在人体生物医学研究中使用安慰剂对照组的问题,将根据对适用标准和/或条例(如《赫尔辛基宣言》和现行良好临床规范条例)的严格审查,评估伦理和科学考虑之间的平衡。版权所有©2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。