43 Effect of dopaminergic medication on risk preference in parkinson’s disease

A. Mandali, R. Chaudhuri, A. Rizos, V. Voon
{"title":"43 Effect of dopaminergic medication on risk preference in parkinson’s disease","authors":"A. Mandali, R. Chaudhuri, A. Rizos, V. Voon","doi":"10.1136/JNNP-2019-BNPA.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Dopaminergic medication being the standard therapeutic treatment improves motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD) but also implicated in the occurrence of impulse control disorders. Data driven computational models such as drift diffusion model utilize behavioural measures to explain subtle changes that are not sensitive to traditional analysis. Here, we aim to analyse risk preference in PD subjects in OFF and ON medication and the effect of dopamine on risk. Methods Sixteen patients PD patients during OFF medication and 14 during ON were tested on the 2 step sequential learning task. We calculated the risk associated with each choice (variance of reward probability) and defined the choice with maximum variance as the risky one, for all 134 trials. With behavioural measures (selected choice- risky vs non-risky and response time) as inputs and risk as an independent factor, we extracted threshold (a), drift rate (v) and response bias (z) parameters using a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) for both groups during ON and OFF drug condition. Statistical analysis on the parameters was analysed using Bayesian factors. Results Bayesian Independent sample t-test between the 2 groups (ON vs OFF) showed a strong evidence for differences in drift rate (BF10=34.28) and response bias (BF10=1.5×1013). We did not observe any evidence for correlation between RL parameters and z for both ON and OFF condition. Behaviourally, with respect to response time, independent sample t-test showed no significance difference between time taken to make risky (t (28)=−1.28, p=ns) and non-risky choices (t (28)=−1.06, p=ns). Similarly, no difference was found for change in risky choice selection in presence of the drug (t (28)=−1.41, p=ns). No differences were found in the traditional reinforcement learning parameters between the groups. Conclusions Using a novel computational analysis, we showed that dopaminergic medication increased the preference to select a risky choice by modulating drift rate and response bias which was not captured by the behavioural measures. Critically we observe an effect on response bias highlighting the role of apriori information in influencing risky decision making.","PeriodicalId":438758,"journal":{"name":"Members’ POSTER Abstracts","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Members’ POSTER Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/JNNP-2019-BNPA.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Dopaminergic medication being the standard therapeutic treatment improves motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD) but also implicated in the occurrence of impulse control disorders. Data driven computational models such as drift diffusion model utilize behavioural measures to explain subtle changes that are not sensitive to traditional analysis. Here, we aim to analyse risk preference in PD subjects in OFF and ON medication and the effect of dopamine on risk. Methods Sixteen patients PD patients during OFF medication and 14 during ON were tested on the 2 step sequential learning task. We calculated the risk associated with each choice (variance of reward probability) and defined the choice with maximum variance as the risky one, for all 134 trials. With behavioural measures (selected choice- risky vs non-risky and response time) as inputs and risk as an independent factor, we extracted threshold (a), drift rate (v) and response bias (z) parameters using a hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) for both groups during ON and OFF drug condition. Statistical analysis on the parameters was analysed using Bayesian factors. Results Bayesian Independent sample t-test between the 2 groups (ON vs OFF) showed a strong evidence for differences in drift rate (BF10=34.28) and response bias (BF10=1.5×1013). We did not observe any evidence for correlation between RL parameters and z for both ON and OFF condition. Behaviourally, with respect to response time, independent sample t-test showed no significance difference between time taken to make risky (t (28)=−1.28, p=ns) and non-risky choices (t (28)=−1.06, p=ns). Similarly, no difference was found for change in risky choice selection in presence of the drug (t (28)=−1.41, p=ns). No differences were found in the traditional reinforcement learning parameters between the groups. Conclusions Using a novel computational analysis, we showed that dopaminergic medication increased the preference to select a risky choice by modulating drift rate and response bias which was not captured by the behavioural measures. Critically we observe an effect on response bias highlighting the role of apriori information in influencing risky decision making.
多巴胺能药物对帕金森病风险偏好的影响
多巴胺能药物治疗是帕金森病(PD)的标准治疗方法,可改善运动症状,但也与冲动控制障碍的发生有关。数据驱动的计算模型,如漂移扩散模型,利用行为测量来解释传统分析不敏感的细微变化。在这里,我们的目的是分析PD受试者在关闭和打开药物时的风险偏好以及多巴胺对风险的影响。方法对16例停药期PD患者和14例开药期PD患者进行两步序贯学习任务测试。我们计算了与每个选择相关的风险(奖励概率方差),并将所有134次试验中方差最大的选择定义为风险选择。以行为测量(选择选择-风险与非风险和反应时间)作为输入,风险作为独立因素,我们使用分层漂移扩散模型(HDDM)提取了两组在开和关药物条件下的阈值(a),漂移率(v)和反应偏差(z)参数。采用贝叶斯因子对各参数进行统计分析。结果两组(ON vs OFF)的贝叶斯独立样本t检验显示,漂移率(BF10=34.28)和反应偏倚(BF10=1.5×1013)存在显著差异。我们没有观察到任何证据表明RL参数和z在开和关条件下都有相关性。行为上,就反应时间而言,独立样本t检验显示,做出风险选择(t (28)= - 1.28, p=ns)和非风险选择(t (28)= - 1.06, p=ns)所花费的时间之间没有显著差异。同样,在药物存在的情况下,风险选择的变化也没有差异(t (28)= - 1.41, p=ns)。两组之间的传统强化学习参数没有差异。使用一种新的计算分析,我们表明多巴胺能药物通过调节漂移率和反应偏差来增加选择风险选择的偏好,这是行为测量无法捕获的。重要的是,我们观察到对反应偏差的影响,突出了先验信息在影响风险决策中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信