A Great Society

Donald H. Reiman
{"title":"A Great Society","authors":"Donald H. Reiman","doi":"10.2979/TEX.2006.1.1.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Society for Textual Scholarship is a great Society that has accomplished its important original mission. Having achieved what its founders intended, the Society should set a new course to enhance its relevance. After reviewing the history of STS, the talk suggests that if we continue to debate theories of textuality among ourselves, we are in danger of becoming a clubby debating society. Instead of arguing about abstract rules for editing, we should now focus on promoting understanding of the significance of textual criticism and editing among our students, colleagues, and the broader public.","PeriodicalId":447122,"journal":{"name":"Textual Cultures: Text, Contexts, Interpretation","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Textual Cultures: Text, Contexts, Interpretation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/TEX.2006.1.1.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

The Society for Textual Scholarship is a great Society that has accomplished its important original mission. Having achieved what its founders intended, the Society should set a new course to enhance its relevance. After reviewing the history of STS, the talk suggests that if we continue to debate theories of textuality among ourselves, we are in danger of becoming a clubby debating society. Instead of arguing about abstract rules for editing, we should now focus on promoting understanding of the significance of textual criticism and editing among our students, colleagues, and the broader public.
伟大的社会
考据学会是一个伟大的学会,已经完成了它的重要的创始使命。在实现了其创始人的目标之后,该协会应该制定一条新的路线,以加强其相关性。在回顾STS的历史之后,该演讲表明,如果我们继续在我们自己之间辩论文本性理论,我们有成为一个俱乐部辩论社会的危险。我们现在应该把重点放在促进学生、同事和更广泛的公众对文本批评和编辑的重要性的理解上,而不是争论抽象的编辑规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信