The GARCH Structural Credit Risk Model: Simulation Analysis and Application to the Bank CDS Market During the 2007-2008 Crisis

Samuel W. Malone, Abel Rodríguez, Enrique ter Horst
{"title":"The GARCH Structural Credit Risk Model: Simulation Analysis and Application to the Bank CDS Market During the 2007-2008 Crisis","authors":"Samuel W. Malone, Abel Rodríguez, Enrique ter Horst","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1364473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop a structural credit risk model in which the unobserved asset volatility of the firm follows a GARCH process, as in Heston and Nandi (2000). We estimate our model using an Expectation Maximization algorithm, and benchmark it using simulated data against the Merton (1974) model, both when the latter is calibrated, and when its parameters are estimated using maximum likelihood techniques as in Duan (1994). The Duan method slightly outperforms GARCH when asset volatility is constant, and GARCH significantly outperforms both the Merton and Duan models when the asset follows a GARCH process. An application of the three models studied to the CDS market for the debt of US banks and financial corporations during the period 2007-2008 indicates high levels of asset volatility and financial leverage for many major banks during this period, although only moderate evidence of stochastic volatility. The GARCH model outperforms both the Duan and Merton models in out-of-sample CDS spread prediction. We document a wide incidence of inversion of the spread term structure in the CDS market, both in 2007 and 2008, and all three models exhibit an inverted spread term structure for all banks studied. The group of banks in which the models are able to generate nontrivial spreads is characterized by significantly higher equity time series volatility, higher average CDS spreads across all maturities, and a higher incidence of spread term structure inversion.","PeriodicalId":315176,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance","volume":"132 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1364473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We develop a structural credit risk model in which the unobserved asset volatility of the firm follows a GARCH process, as in Heston and Nandi (2000). We estimate our model using an Expectation Maximization algorithm, and benchmark it using simulated data against the Merton (1974) model, both when the latter is calibrated, and when its parameters are estimated using maximum likelihood techniques as in Duan (1994). The Duan method slightly outperforms GARCH when asset volatility is constant, and GARCH significantly outperforms both the Merton and Duan models when the asset follows a GARCH process. An application of the three models studied to the CDS market for the debt of US banks and financial corporations during the period 2007-2008 indicates high levels of asset volatility and financial leverage for many major banks during this period, although only moderate evidence of stochastic volatility. The GARCH model outperforms both the Duan and Merton models in out-of-sample CDS spread prediction. We document a wide incidence of inversion of the spread term structure in the CDS market, both in 2007 and 2008, and all three models exhibit an inverted spread term structure for all banks studied. The group of banks in which the models are able to generate nontrivial spreads is characterized by significantly higher equity time series volatility, higher average CDS spreads across all maturities, and a higher incidence of spread term structure inversion.
GARCH结构信用风险模型:2007-2008年金融危机期间银行CDS市场的模拟分析及应用
我们开发了一个结构性信用风险模型,其中公司未观察到的资产波动遵循GARCH过程,如Heston和Nandi(2000)所述。我们使用期望最大化算法估计我们的模型,并使用模拟数据对Merton(1974)模型进行基准测试,当后者被校准时,以及当其参数使用最大似然技术估计时,如Duan(1994)。当资产波动率恒定时,Duan方法略优于GARCH方法,当资产遵循GARCH过程时,GARCH方法明显优于Merton模型和Duan模型。将所研究的三个模型应用于2007-2008年期间美国银行和金融公司债务的CDS市场表明,在此期间,许多主要银行的资产波动性和财务杠杆水平很高,尽管只有适度的随机波动证据。GARCH模型在样本外CDS价差预测方面优于Duan模型和Merton模型。我们在2007年和2008年记录了CDS市场中利差期限结构反转的广泛发生率,并且所有三个模型都显示了所有研究银行的反向利差期限结构。模型能够产生非平凡利差的银行组具有显著更高的股票时间序列波动性,所有期限的平均CDS利差更高,利差期限结构反转的发生率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信