Elementary Students’ Understanding of CS Terms

Jessica Vandenberg, Jennifer L. Tsan, D. Boulden, Zarifa Zakaria, Collin Lynch, K. Boyer, E. Wiebe
{"title":"Elementary Students’ Understanding of CS Terms","authors":"Jessica Vandenberg, Jennifer L. Tsan, D. Boulden, Zarifa Zakaria, Collin Lynch, K. Boyer, E. Wiebe","doi":"10.1145/3386364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The language and concepts used by curriculum designers are not always interpreted by children as designers intended. This can be problematic when researchers use self-reported survey instruments in concert with curricula, which often rely on the implicit belief that students’ understanding aligns with their own. We report on our refinement of a validated survey to measure upper elementary students’ attitudes and perspectives about computer science (CS), using an iterative, design-based research approach informed by educational and psychological cognitive interview processes. We interviewed six groups of students over three iterations of the instrument on their understanding of CS concepts and attitudes toward coding. Our findings indicated that students could not explain the terms computer programs nor computer science as expected. Furthermore, they struggled to understand how coding may support their learning in other domains. These results may guide the development of appropriate CS-related survey instruments and curricular materials for K–6 students.","PeriodicalId":352564,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3386364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The language and concepts used by curriculum designers are not always interpreted by children as designers intended. This can be problematic when researchers use self-reported survey instruments in concert with curricula, which often rely on the implicit belief that students’ understanding aligns with their own. We report on our refinement of a validated survey to measure upper elementary students’ attitudes and perspectives about computer science (CS), using an iterative, design-based research approach informed by educational and psychological cognitive interview processes. We interviewed six groups of students over three iterations of the instrument on their understanding of CS concepts and attitudes toward coding. Our findings indicated that students could not explain the terms computer programs nor computer science as expected. Furthermore, they struggled to understand how coding may support their learning in other domains. These results may guide the development of appropriate CS-related survey instruments and curricular materials for K–6 students.
小学生对计算机科学术语的理解
课程设计者所使用的语言和概念并不总是被孩子们理解为设计者的意图。当研究人员将自我报告的调查工具与课程结合使用时,这可能会产生问题,因为课程通常依赖于学生的理解与他们自己的理解一致的隐含信念。我们报告了我们对一项有效调查的改进,该调查采用迭代的、基于设计的研究方法,通过教育和心理认知访谈过程来衡量高年级小学生对计算机科学(CS)的态度和观点。我们对六组学生进行了三次访谈,了解他们对计算机科学概念的理解和对编码的态度。我们的研究结果表明,学生不能像预期的那样解释计算机程序和计算机科学这两个术语。此外,他们努力理解编码如何支持他们在其他领域的学习。这些结果可以指导开发适合K-6年级学生的cs相关调查工具和课程材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信