Fraudulent act: problems of legal application

O.P. Adamovych
{"title":"Fraudulent act: problems of legal application","authors":"O.P. Adamovych","doi":"10.37634/efp.2023.7.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In recent years, in the national doctrine of civil law, as well as in the judicial practice of Ukraine, there has been an expansion of features of the invalid transactions, in particular, a relatively new concept of \"fraudulent act\" has appeared, as a transaction aimed to harm the creditor. The paper is devoted to study content of the concept of fraudulent acts and determination of their characteristic features, the consequences of invalidating such transactions. Attention is drawn to the fact that the lack of consolidation the concept of a fraudulent act in the regulatory acts of Ukraine leads to different approaches in the interpretation of the concept of fraudulent act, which is followed, first of all, in court decisions.\nThe purpose of the paper is to research perspectives for development and improvement of legal regulations in the area of invalidating transactions, as well as to develop proposals regarding the implementation of the concept of a fraudulent act to the rules of the civil legislation of Ukraine.\nResults. Based on the analysis of numerous judical practices, the concept of a fraudulent act is formulated through the prism of the general principles of civil legislation and the limits of the exercise of civil rights. Also defined the main characteristic features of such transactions are defined. It is emphasized that fictitious and fraudulent transactions have common features, but they differ in their purpose and consequences. The pudlication argues that the main purpose of concluding a fraudulent act is to cause damage to the creditor and prevent enforcement of the debtor's property.\nConclusion. The paper grounds necessity to consolidate the definition of a fraudulent act in the Ukrainian legislation and to form a united concept in legal approaches to determining the grounds for recognizing fraudulent acts as invalid.","PeriodicalId":112155,"journal":{"name":"Economics. Finances. Law","volume":"279 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics. Finances. Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37634/efp.2023.7.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. In recent years, in the national doctrine of civil law, as well as in the judicial practice of Ukraine, there has been an expansion of features of the invalid transactions, in particular, a relatively new concept of "fraudulent act" has appeared, as a transaction aimed to harm the creditor. The paper is devoted to study content of the concept of fraudulent acts and determination of their characteristic features, the consequences of invalidating such transactions. Attention is drawn to the fact that the lack of consolidation the concept of a fraudulent act in the regulatory acts of Ukraine leads to different approaches in the interpretation of the concept of fraudulent act, which is followed, first of all, in court decisions. The purpose of the paper is to research perspectives for development and improvement of legal regulations in the area of invalidating transactions, as well as to develop proposals regarding the implementation of the concept of a fraudulent act to the rules of the civil legislation of Ukraine. Results. Based on the analysis of numerous judical practices, the concept of a fraudulent act is formulated through the prism of the general principles of civil legislation and the limits of the exercise of civil rights. Also defined the main characteristic features of such transactions are defined. It is emphasized that fictitious and fraudulent transactions have common features, but they differ in their purpose and consequences. The pudlication argues that the main purpose of concluding a fraudulent act is to cause damage to the creditor and prevent enforcement of the debtor's property. Conclusion. The paper grounds necessity to consolidate the definition of a fraudulent act in the Ukrainian legislation and to form a united concept in legal approaches to determining the grounds for recognizing fraudulent acts as invalid.
欺诈行为:法律适用问题
介绍。近年来,在国家民法学说以及乌克兰司法实践中,无效交易的特征有所扩展,特别是出现了一个相对较新的概念“欺诈行为”,作为一种以损害债权人为目的的交易。本文致力于研究欺诈行为概念的内容及其特征的确定,以及使此类交易无效的后果。值得注意的是,乌克兰的监管行为中缺乏对欺诈行为概念的巩固,导致对欺诈行为概念的解释出现了不同的方法,首先是在法院判决中。本文的目的是研究发展和完善无效交易领域法律法规的观点,并就乌克兰民事立法规则中欺诈行为概念的实施提出建议。本文在分析众多司法实践的基础上,从民事立法的一般原则和民事权利行使的限制的角度出发,阐述了欺诈行为的概念。还定义了此类事务的主要特征特征。本文强调,虚假交易和欺诈交易具有共同的特点,但其目的和后果不同。该公告认为,认定欺诈行为的主要目的是对债权人造成损害,并阻止债务人财产的强制执行。本文认为有必要在乌克兰立法中巩固欺诈行为的定义,并在确定承认欺诈行为无效的理由的法律途径中形成统一的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信