A Comparison Study on Processing ILI Data With Different Filtering Methods

Zhenhui Liu, Stig Olav Kvarme, Odd Einar Lindøe
{"title":"A Comparison Study on Processing ILI Data With Different Filtering Methods","authors":"Zhenhui Liu, Stig Olav Kvarme, Odd Einar Lindøe","doi":"10.1115/OMAE2018-77006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In-line inspection (ILI) data processing is a crucial process on assessing the remaining capacity of corroded pipelines. It is used to generate the RBP (river bottom profile) or M AV (moving average) file which could be further used in the capacity calculations. There are large uncertainties regarding the qualities of ILI data itself, which are dependent on the accuracies of the ILI tool, the reporting method and the condition of the inspected pipelines et. al. It is thus required that the post-process of the ILI data should not add more uncertainties to the capacity check. Challenges exist on generating reliable RBP/MAV from the ILI data on general base. This paper originates from work during the in-house software development for corroded pipeline tool. Three different algorithms on filtering the ILI data are examined. They are the method recommended by DNV-RP-F101 (with modification), the median filter algorithm and the gaussian filter algorithm. The latter two algorithms are from standard methods for image denoising. A comparison study has been performed with several actual ILI data sets. Finally, conclusions and suggestions have been made, which may provide useful hints for industry application.","PeriodicalId":155568,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2018-77006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In-line inspection (ILI) data processing is a crucial process on assessing the remaining capacity of corroded pipelines. It is used to generate the RBP (river bottom profile) or M AV (moving average) file which could be further used in the capacity calculations. There are large uncertainties regarding the qualities of ILI data itself, which are dependent on the accuracies of the ILI tool, the reporting method and the condition of the inspected pipelines et. al. It is thus required that the post-process of the ILI data should not add more uncertainties to the capacity check. Challenges exist on generating reliable RBP/MAV from the ILI data on general base. This paper originates from work during the in-house software development for corroded pipeline tool. Three different algorithms on filtering the ILI data are examined. They are the method recommended by DNV-RP-F101 (with modification), the median filter algorithm and the gaussian filter algorithm. The latter two algorithms are from standard methods for image denoising. A comparison study has been performed with several actual ILI data sets. Finally, conclusions and suggestions have been made, which may provide useful hints for industry application.
不同滤波方法处理ILI数据的比较研究
在线检测(ILI)数据处理是评估腐蚀管道剩余容量的关键环节。它被用来生成RBP(河底轮廓)或mav(移动平均)文件,这些文件可以进一步用于容量计算。ILI数据本身的质量存在很大的不确定性,这取决于ILI工具的准确性、报告方法和被检查管道的状况等。因此,要求ILI数据的后处理不应给容量检查增加更多的不确定性。从一般基础的ILI数据生成可靠的RBP/MAV存在挑战。本文来源于腐蚀管道工具的内部软件开发工作。研究了三种不同的ILI数据过滤算法。分别是DNV-RP-F101(修改)推荐的方法、中值滤波算法和高斯滤波算法。后两种算法来自标准的图像去噪方法。与几个实际ILI数据集进行了比较研究。最后,给出了结论和建议,为行业应用提供了有益的提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信