Scenario Based Simulation Study of Ad Hoc Routing Protocol's Behavior in Wireless Sensor Networks

2009 International Conference on Future Computer and Communication Pub Date : 2009-04-03 DOI:10.1109/ICFCC.2009.72

S. Gowrishankar, S. Sarkar, T. Basavaraju

{"title":"Scenario Based Simulation Study of Ad Hoc Routing Protocol's Behavior in Wireless Sensor Networks","authors":"S. Gowrishankar, S. Sarkar, T. Basavaraju","doi":"10.1109/ICFCC.2009.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates and undertakes simulation based study of Adhoc routing protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. For our simulation based study we have considered three different scenarios where a Adhoc routing protocol can be applied, namely a) Phenom nodes with Mobility, Sensor nodes with mobility while the SINK node is stationary b) Phenom nodes with Mobility, Sensor nodes are stationary and Sink node is stationary c) Phenom nodes are stationary, Sensor nodes are stationary and SINK node is stationary. We have considered AODV and DSR as the Adhoc routing protocols for comparison in these scenarios. We wanted to consider a table driven routing protocol like DSDV but it was not able to scale beyond 80 nodes in the very first scenario itself. As we wanted uniformity across all the scenarios we opted out of table driven routing protocols like DSDV, even though DSDV could have been used in the third scenario. Finally, through our analysis we show the various intricacies that are associated with Adhoc routing protocols when used in a sensor environment. We also list the various problems we faced while simulating the routing protocols in each of the scenarios.","PeriodicalId":338489,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Future Computer and Communication","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Future Computer and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFCC.2009.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper investigates and undertakes simulation based study of Adhoc routing protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks. For our simulation based study we have considered three different scenarios where a Adhoc routing protocol can be applied, namely a) Phenom nodes with Mobility, Sensor nodes with mobility while the SINK node is stationary b) Phenom nodes with Mobility, Sensor nodes are stationary and Sink node is stationary c) Phenom nodes are stationary, Sensor nodes are stationary and SINK node is stationary. We have considered AODV and DSR as the Adhoc routing protocols for comparison in these scenarios. We wanted to consider a table driven routing protocol like DSDV but it was not able to scale beyond 80 nodes in the very first scenario itself. As we wanted uniformity across all the scenarios we opted out of table driven routing protocols like DSDV, even though DSDV could have been used in the third scenario. Finally, through our analysis we show the various intricacies that are associated with Adhoc routing protocols when used in a sensor environment. We also list the various problems we faced while simulating the routing protocols in each of the scenarios.

查看原文本刊更多论文

无线传感器网络中Ad Hoc路由协议行为的场景仿真研究

本文对无线传感器网络中的Adhoc路由协议进行了基于仿真的研究。在我们基于仿真的研究中，我们考虑了三种不同的Adhoc路由协议应用场景，即a)具有移动性的现象节点，具有移动性的传感器节点，而SINK节点是静止的;b)具有移动性的现象节点，传感器节点是静止的，SINK节点是静止的;c)现象节点是静止的，传感器节点是静止的，SINK节点是静止的。为了在这些场景中进行比较，我们将AODV和DSR作为Adhoc路由协议。我们想要考虑像DSDV这样的表驱动路由协议，但在第一个场景中，它无法扩展到超过80个节点。因为我们想要在所有场景中保持一致性，所以我们选择了表驱动的路由协议，比如DSDV，尽管DSDV可以在第三种场景中使用。最后，通过我们的分析，我们展示了在传感器环境中使用时与Adhoc路由协议相关的各种复杂性。我们还列出了在每个场景中模拟路由协议时遇到的各种问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2009 International Conference on Future Computer and Communication

自引率

0.00%

发文量