A Numerical Analysis of the Hemodynamic Functionality of Human Coronary Stenosis Under Different Physiologic Conditions and Boundary Condition Formulations

I. Fayssal, F. Moukalled
{"title":"A Numerical Analysis of the Hemodynamic Functionality of Human Coronary Stenosis Under Different Physiologic Conditions and Boundary Condition Formulations","authors":"I. Fayssal, F. Moukalled","doi":"10.1115/ajkfluids2019-4820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Coronary artery disease (CAD) is among the foremost causes for human death worldwide. This study aims at investigating the performance of different boundary condition model types to characterize CAD functional significance. In addition, alternate models to estimate FFR using any different combination of boundary conditions at inlet and outlet were analyzed. In the first type of boundary condition, an outflow resistance model is used combined with a fixed pressure at inlet. In the second model of boundary conditions, constant pressure values are imposed at the domain inlet and outlet/s sections. In the third model, a zero diffusion flux is applied at outlet with a pre-specified flow rate at inlet. Numerical simulations performed on healthy and stenosed idealized and physiological arterial models revealed the superiority of the first type of boundary condition to directly capture the level of ischemia in diseased arteries. However, in this model, special numerical treatment at the outflow boundary is needed to dampen pseudo numerical reflections entering the computational domain. Alternative simple methods are developed to tackle the problem incurred in the second and third types of boundary condition types. The alternate models are effective for carrying extensive parametric studies with minimal computational effort. The new developed methods allow results generated via generic simulations under any specified boundary condition type to correctly estimate CAD functional significance. The obtained surrogate models account for the effects of the patient-specific physiologic parameters and can be easily incorporated without modifying existing CFD codes. Moreover, where it is unfeasible to experimentally incorporate the downstream effects of a given diseased arterial segment, an important aspect the alternative models provide is that they can be easily adopted by experimentalists through building in-vitro arterial models to assess the functional significance of the obstruction caused by the disease and its relation to any given patient specific physiologic parameter.","PeriodicalId":346736,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Computational Fluid Dynamics","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Computational Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ajkfluids2019-4820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is among the foremost causes for human death worldwide. This study aims at investigating the performance of different boundary condition model types to characterize CAD functional significance. In addition, alternate models to estimate FFR using any different combination of boundary conditions at inlet and outlet were analyzed. In the first type of boundary condition, an outflow resistance model is used combined with a fixed pressure at inlet. In the second model of boundary conditions, constant pressure values are imposed at the domain inlet and outlet/s sections. In the third model, a zero diffusion flux is applied at outlet with a pre-specified flow rate at inlet. Numerical simulations performed on healthy and stenosed idealized and physiological arterial models revealed the superiority of the first type of boundary condition to directly capture the level of ischemia in diseased arteries. However, in this model, special numerical treatment at the outflow boundary is needed to dampen pseudo numerical reflections entering the computational domain. Alternative simple methods are developed to tackle the problem incurred in the second and third types of boundary condition types. The alternate models are effective for carrying extensive parametric studies with minimal computational effort. The new developed methods allow results generated via generic simulations under any specified boundary condition type to correctly estimate CAD functional significance. The obtained surrogate models account for the effects of the patient-specific physiologic parameters and can be easily incorporated without modifying existing CFD codes. Moreover, where it is unfeasible to experimentally incorporate the downstream effects of a given diseased arterial segment, an important aspect the alternative models provide is that they can be easily adopted by experimentalists through building in-vitro arterial models to assess the functional significance of the obstruction caused by the disease and its relation to any given patient specific physiologic parameter.
不同生理条件和边界条件下冠状动脉狭窄血流动力学功能的数值分析
冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是世界范围内人类死亡的主要原因之一。本研究旨在探讨不同边界条件模型类型的性能,以表征CAD的功能意义。此外,还分析了使用不同进出口边界条件组合来估计FFR的备选模型。在第一类边界条件下,采用出口阻力模型和进口固定压力相结合的方法。在边界条件的第二种模型中,在区域入口和出口/s段施加恒定压力值。在第三种模型中,在出口处施加零扩散通量,在进口处施加预先指定的流量。对健康动脉、狭窄动脉和生理动脉模型进行的数值模拟表明,第一类边界条件在直接捕捉病变动脉缺血程度方面具有优势。然而,在该模型中,需要在流出边界处进行特殊的数值处理,以抑制进入计算域的伪数值反射。为解决第二类和第三类边界条件类型所引起的问题,提出了几种简单的替代方法。替代模型可以有效地以最小的计算量进行广泛的参数研究。新开发的方法允许在任何特定边界条件类型下通过通用模拟生成结果,以正确估计CAD功能意义。获得的代理模型考虑了患者特定生理参数的影响,可以很容易地合并,而无需修改现有的CFD代码。此外,在无法通过实验纳入特定病变动脉段的下游影响的情况下,替代模型提供的一个重要方面是,实验人员可以通过建立体外动脉模型来轻松采用这些模型,以评估疾病引起的阻塞的功能意义及其与任何给定患者特定生理参数的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信