Income Inequality and Economic Growth: Is There a Difference between Rising and Falling Top Income Shares?

Toni Juuti
{"title":"Income Inequality and Economic Growth: Is There a Difference between Rising and Falling Top Income Shares?","authors":"Toni Juuti","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3575643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study contributes to the vast empirical literature on the interplay between income inequality and economic growth in two fronts. First, by using data from the World Inequality Database, potential cross-country heterogeneity, which is concealed in studies that use panel data, is addressed. Second, by adopting a flexible autoregressive distributed lag model, the growth of per capita GDP is allowed to have asymmetric responses to rising and falling top income shares. The analysis covers six countries over the period 1950-2010: Australia, Canada, France, India, Japan and the United States. In France and the United States, falling income shares of the highest-earning percentile were associated with lower subsequent economic growth. In India, growth was positively associated with a rising top income share. Thus, evidence is found for both cross-country heterogeneity and asymmetries. Adjustment processes to changes in inequality took place quickly in all countries suggesting that the empirical approach captures relatively direct economic mechanisms rather than slow-moving transmission channels. Furthermore, up-to-date data on the top income shares are used to briefly revisit previously used panel estimation techniques.","PeriodicalId":129815,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study contributes to the vast empirical literature on the interplay between income inequality and economic growth in two fronts. First, by using data from the World Inequality Database, potential cross-country heterogeneity, which is concealed in studies that use panel data, is addressed. Second, by adopting a flexible autoregressive distributed lag model, the growth of per capita GDP is allowed to have asymmetric responses to rising and falling top income shares. The analysis covers six countries over the period 1950-2010: Australia, Canada, France, India, Japan and the United States. In France and the United States, falling income shares of the highest-earning percentile were associated with lower subsequent economic growth. In India, growth was positively associated with a rising top income share. Thus, evidence is found for both cross-country heterogeneity and asymmetries. Adjustment processes to changes in inequality took place quickly in all countries suggesting that the empirical approach captures relatively direct economic mechanisms rather than slow-moving transmission channels. Furthermore, up-to-date data on the top income shares are used to briefly revisit previously used panel estimation techniques.
收入不平等与经济增长:最高收入份额上升与下降之间存在差异吗?
这项研究为从两个方面探讨收入不平等与经济增长之间相互作用的大量实证文献做出了贡献。首先,通过使用来自世界不平等数据库的数据,解决了在使用面板数据的研究中隐藏的潜在的跨国异质性。其次,通过采用灵活的自回归分布滞后模型,允许人均GDP的增长对最高收入份额的上升和下降产生不对称反应。该分析涵盖了1950年至2010年期间的六个国家:澳大利亚、加拿大、法国、印度、日本和美国。在法国和美国,最高收入百分位数的收入份额下降与随后较低的经济增长有关。在印度,经济增长与最高收入占比的上升呈正相关。因此,我们发现了跨国异质性和不对称性的证据。对不平等变化的调整过程在所有国家都发生得很快,这表明经验方法捕捉到的是相对直接的经济机制,而不是缓慢的传播渠道。此外,关于最高收入份额的最新数据用于简要回顾以前使用的面板估计技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信