Common architecture for decoding turbo and LDPC codes

T. S. Gautham, A. Thangaraj, D. Jalihal
{"title":"Common architecture for decoding turbo and LDPC codes","authors":"T. S. Gautham, A. Thangaraj, D. Jalihal","doi":"10.1109/NCC.2010.5430239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Turbo codes and Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes have been shown to be practical codes that can approach Shannon capacity in several communication systems. In terms of performance and implementation complexity, LDPC codes and turbo codes are highly comparable, especially at coding rates around 1/2. In many recent wireless standards such as 3GPP LTE and WiMax, both turbo and LDPC codes have been recommended at the encoder. However, the decoder for turbo codes involves trellises and the BCJR algorithm, while the decoder for LDPC codes uses sparse graphs and the message passing algorithm. Therefore, in several implementations, a designer is forced to implement either the turbo decoder or the LDPC decoder. The main idea behind this work is to enable the implementation of both decoders using a common architecture. We view the constituent convolutional code in a turbo code as a block code, and construct a sparse parity check matrix for it. Then, the sparse matrix and the associated bipartite graph are used for decoding the convolutional code by soft message passing algorithms. Simulation results show a manageable degradation in performance with a reduction in complexity.","PeriodicalId":130953,"journal":{"name":"2010 National Conference On Communications (NCC)","volume":"28 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 National Conference On Communications (NCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NCC.2010.5430239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Turbo codes and Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes have been shown to be practical codes that can approach Shannon capacity in several communication systems. In terms of performance and implementation complexity, LDPC codes and turbo codes are highly comparable, especially at coding rates around 1/2. In many recent wireless standards such as 3GPP LTE and WiMax, both turbo and LDPC codes have been recommended at the encoder. However, the decoder for turbo codes involves trellises and the BCJR algorithm, while the decoder for LDPC codes uses sparse graphs and the message passing algorithm. Therefore, in several implementations, a designer is forced to implement either the turbo decoder or the LDPC decoder. The main idea behind this work is to enable the implementation of both decoders using a common architecture. We view the constituent convolutional code in a turbo code as a block code, and construct a sparse parity check matrix for it. Then, the sparse matrix and the associated bipartite graph are used for decoding the convolutional code by soft message passing algorithms. Simulation results show a manageable degradation in performance with a reduction in complexity.
解码turbo码和LDPC码的通用架构
Turbo码和低密度奇偶校验(LDPC)码已被证明是在一些通信系统中可以接近香农容量的实用码。在性能和实现复杂性方面,LDPC码和turbo码具有高度可比性,特别是在编码速率约为1/2时。在最近的许多无线标准中,如3GPP LTE和WiMax, turbo和LDPC编码都被推荐用于编码器。然而,涡轮码的解码器涉及栅格和BCJR算法,而LDPC码的解码器使用稀疏图和消息传递算法。因此,在一些实现中,设计人员被迫实现turbo解码器或LDPC解码器。这项工作背后的主要思想是使两个解码器使用一个共同的架构实现。我们将turbo码中的组成卷积码看作一个分组码,并构造了一个稀疏奇偶校验矩阵。然后,利用稀疏矩阵和关联二部图,通过软消息传递算法对卷积码进行解码。仿真结果表明,随着复杂度的降低,性能的下降是可控的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信