A Trace Driven Simulation Study of VM Consolidation Algorithms in Cloud Computing

Nagma, Jaiteg Singh, J. Sidhu
{"title":"A Trace Driven Simulation Study of VM Consolidation Algorithms in Cloud Computing","authors":"Nagma, Jaiteg Singh, J. Sidhu","doi":"10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtual machine consolidation is a prominent method for decreasing consumption of energy in cloud computing. Tremendous amount of work is found in literature for development of techniques for hosts underload, overload detection, virtual machine selection and placement to perform consolidation. The major data set used for testing the performance of these algorithms is publicly accessible Planet lab workload trace. It is essential to know the behavior of standard algorithms for virtual machine consolidation on different workload traces. This paper evaluates the performance of these algorithms on Bitbrains and Google cluster trace. The simulations are planned and performed on CloudSim platform. Results of execution of algorithms on Bitbrains trace are compared with Google workload trace. Results indicate that energy consumption, number of virtual machine migrations, number of hosts and service level agreement violation time per active host of best algorithms differ by 50.2%, 13.6%, 73.9% and 57.1% respectively. Results of objectively comparing these algorithms can contribute in formation of future research strategy in VM consolidation.","PeriodicalId":303401,"journal":{"name":"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)","volume":"82 Suppl 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Fifth International Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDGC.2018.8745828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Virtual machine consolidation is a prominent method for decreasing consumption of energy in cloud computing. Tremendous amount of work is found in literature for development of techniques for hosts underload, overload detection, virtual machine selection and placement to perform consolidation. The major data set used for testing the performance of these algorithms is publicly accessible Planet lab workload trace. It is essential to know the behavior of standard algorithms for virtual machine consolidation on different workload traces. This paper evaluates the performance of these algorithms on Bitbrains and Google cluster trace. The simulations are planned and performed on CloudSim platform. Results of execution of algorithms on Bitbrains trace are compared with Google workload trace. Results indicate that energy consumption, number of virtual machine migrations, number of hosts and service level agreement violation time per active host of best algorithms differ by 50.2%, 13.6%, 73.9% and 57.1% respectively. Results of objectively comparing these algorithms can contribute in formation of future research strategy in VM consolidation.
云计算中VM整合算法的跟踪驱动仿真研究
虚拟机整合是云计算中降低能耗的重要方法。在文献中发现了大量的工作用于开发主机欠载、过载检测、虚拟机选择和放置以执行整合的技术。用于测试这些算法性能的主要数据集是公开访问的Planet实验室工作负载跟踪。了解不同工作负载轨迹上用于虚拟机整合的标准算法的行为非常重要。本文在Bitbrains和Google聚类跟踪上对这些算法的性能进行了评估。仿真在CloudSim平台上进行规划和执行。算法在Bitbrains跟踪上的执行结果与Google工作负载跟踪进行了比较。结果表明,最佳算法的能耗、虚拟机迁移次数、主机数量和每台活跃主机违反服务水平协议时间分别相差50.2%、13.6%、73.9%和57.1%。客观比较这些算法的结果有助于形成未来VM整合的研究策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信