Validation of tropospheric ties at the test setup GNSS co-location site Potsdam

C. Kitpracha, R. Heinkelmann, M. Ramatschi, K. Balidakis, Benjamin Männel, H. Schuh
{"title":"Validation of tropospheric ties at the test setup GNSS co-location site Potsdam","authors":"C. Kitpracha, R. Heinkelmann, M. Ramatschi, K. Balidakis, Benjamin Männel, H. Schuh","doi":"10.5194/AMT-2021-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Atmospheric ties are theoretically affected by the height differences between antennas at the same site and the meteorological conditions. However, there is often a discrepancy between the expected zenith delay differences and those estimated from geodetic analysis, potentially degrading a combined solution employing atmospheric ties. In order to investigate the possible effects on GNSS atmospheric delay, this study set up an experiment of four co-located GNSS stations of the same type, both antenna and receiver. Specific height differences for each antenna w.r.t the reference antenna are given. One antenna was equipped with a radome at the same height and type as a antenna close to the ground. In addition, a meteorological sensor was used for meteorological data recording. The results show that tropospheric ties from the analytical equation based on meteorological data from GPT3, Numerical Weather Model, and in-situ measurements, and ray-traced tropospheric ties, reduced the bias of zenith delay roughly by 72 %. However, the in-situ tropospheric ties yield the best precision in this study. These results demonstrate, that the instrument effects on GNSS zenith delays were mitigated by using the same instrument. In contrast, the radome causes unexpected bias of GNSS zenith delays in this study. Additionally, multipath effects at low-elevation observations degraded the tropospheric east gradients.\n","PeriodicalId":441110,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/AMT-2021-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Atmospheric ties are theoretically affected by the height differences between antennas at the same site and the meteorological conditions. However, there is often a discrepancy between the expected zenith delay differences and those estimated from geodetic analysis, potentially degrading a combined solution employing atmospheric ties. In order to investigate the possible effects on GNSS atmospheric delay, this study set up an experiment of four co-located GNSS stations of the same type, both antenna and receiver. Specific height differences for each antenna w.r.t the reference antenna are given. One antenna was equipped with a radome at the same height and type as a antenna close to the ground. In addition, a meteorological sensor was used for meteorological data recording. The results show that tropospheric ties from the analytical equation based on meteorological data from GPT3, Numerical Weather Model, and in-situ measurements, and ray-traced tropospheric ties, reduced the bias of zenith delay roughly by 72 %. However, the in-situ tropospheric ties yield the best precision in this study. These results demonstrate, that the instrument effects on GNSS zenith delays were mitigated by using the same instrument. In contrast, the radome causes unexpected bias of GNSS zenith delays in this study. Additionally, multipath effects at low-elevation observations degraded the tropospheric east gradients.
在波茨坦测试装置GNSS共置站点验证对流层联系
摘要大气联系在理论上受同一地点天线高度差和气象条件的影响。然而,在预期的天顶延迟差异与大地测量分析估计的延迟差异之间经常存在差异,这可能会降低采用大气联系的组合解决方案。为了研究大气延迟对GNSS大气延迟可能产生的影响,本研究设置了4个同类型GNSS天线和接收机共置的实验。给出了各天线相对于参考天线的具体高度差。一个天线配备了一个天线罩,其高度和类型与靠近地面的天线相同。此外,还使用气象传感器进行气象数据记录。结果表明,基于GPT3气象资料、数值天气模式和现场测量数据的解析方程的对流层联系,以及射线追踪对流层联系,使天顶延迟偏差降低了约72%。然而,原位对流层联系在本研究中产生了最好的精度。这些结果表明,使用相同的仪器可以减轻仪器对GNSS天顶延迟的影响。相反,在本研究中,天线罩会引起GNSS天顶延迟的意外偏差。此外,低海拔观测的多径效应降低了对流层东部梯度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信