Three Types of Invisibility: The Acropolis of Athens

Richard T. Neer
{"title":"Three Types of Invisibility: The Acropolis of Athens","authors":"Richard T. Neer","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198845560.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classical Greek monuments were meant to be seen. The poet Pindar often refers to the conspicuousness of architecture: “When a work is begun,” he declares, “it is necessary to make its façade far-beaming” (Olympian 6.3–4), and a sacred precinct can be tēlephantos, “shining from afar” (fr. 5 SM). According to Plato, the works of Pheidias were made “conspicuously” (periphanōs), literally, “so as to seen round about,” a term that can also be used to distinguish freestanding sculpture from relief (Meno 91d). The philosopher may have been thinking of Pheidias’ great bronze Athena on the Acropolis of Athens, the spear and helmet of which, we are told, were visible to ships at sea. The conspicuousness of Greek architecture was integral to its function. The Acropolis itself, for instance, was the supreme monument of the most powerful and long-lived democracy of Classical antiquity. Soaring over Athens, its great buildings—the temple of Athena Nike, the Parthenon, the Erechtheum—were statements of the official ideology of the Athenian empire and testaments to its glory. Clustered around them were numerous private and public dedications: statues, objets d’art, and inscriptions on stone. Today these monuments are landmarks of art history and magnets for tourism. Curiously, however, many of the Acropolis monuments were more or less invisible in the 400s BCE. Visibility was circumstantial and contingent, in ways that I shall elaborate below. From this starting point flow two questions: what does it mean for a democracy that its most glorious public monuments should be, to a greater or lesser degree, unseen? And what are the consequences for art history? The Acropolis monuments were subject to at least three distinct types of invisibility. First, literal invisibility, in the sense of occlusion or concealment. In this case, any light that strikes the object does not bounce back and hit an observer’s eye. Were one to bury a statue in a hole, it would be occluded in this sense; the statue would be, literally, invisible.","PeriodicalId":186392,"journal":{"name":"Conditions of Visibility","volume":"898 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conditions of Visibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198845560.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Classical Greek monuments were meant to be seen. The poet Pindar often refers to the conspicuousness of architecture: “When a work is begun,” he declares, “it is necessary to make its façade far-beaming” (Olympian 6.3–4), and a sacred precinct can be tēlephantos, “shining from afar” (fr. 5 SM). According to Plato, the works of Pheidias were made “conspicuously” (periphanōs), literally, “so as to seen round about,” a term that can also be used to distinguish freestanding sculpture from relief (Meno 91d). The philosopher may have been thinking of Pheidias’ great bronze Athena on the Acropolis of Athens, the spear and helmet of which, we are told, were visible to ships at sea. The conspicuousness of Greek architecture was integral to its function. The Acropolis itself, for instance, was the supreme monument of the most powerful and long-lived democracy of Classical antiquity. Soaring over Athens, its great buildings—the temple of Athena Nike, the Parthenon, the Erechtheum—were statements of the official ideology of the Athenian empire and testaments to its glory. Clustered around them were numerous private and public dedications: statues, objets d’art, and inscriptions on stone. Today these monuments are landmarks of art history and magnets for tourism. Curiously, however, many of the Acropolis monuments were more or less invisible in the 400s BCE. Visibility was circumstantial and contingent, in ways that I shall elaborate below. From this starting point flow two questions: what does it mean for a democracy that its most glorious public monuments should be, to a greater or lesser degree, unseen? And what are the consequences for art history? The Acropolis monuments were subject to at least three distinct types of invisibility. First, literal invisibility, in the sense of occlusion or concealment. In this case, any light that strikes the object does not bounce back and hit an observer’s eye. Were one to bury a statue in a hole, it would be occluded in this sense; the statue would be, literally, invisible.
三种隐形方式:雅典卫城
古典希腊的纪念碑就是用来观赏的。诗人品达(Pindar)经常提到建筑的显著性:“当一项工作开始时,”他宣称,“有必要使它的外表散发出远光”(《奥林匹亚诗篇》6.3-4),一个神圣的区域可以是tēlephantos,“从远处发光”(《诗篇》5章)。根据柏拉图的说法,菲迪亚斯的作品被制作得“引人注目”(periphanōs),字面意思是“可以看到周围”,这个术语也可以用来区分独立雕塑和浮雕(Meno 91d)。这位哲学家可能想到了菲迪亚斯在雅典卫城的伟大的青铜雅典娜,我们被告知,海上的船只可以看到它的矛和头盔。希腊建筑的显著性与其功能是不可分割的。例如,雅典卫城本身就是古代最强大、最长寿的民主国家的最高纪念碑。高耸在雅典上空的宏伟建筑——雅典娜·耐克神庙、帕台农神庙、埃瑞克修神庙——是雅典帝国官方意识形态的宣言,也是其荣耀的见证。围绕着它们的是许多私人和公共的奉献:雕像、艺术品和石碑。今天,这些纪念碑是艺术史的地标,也是吸引游客的地方。然而,奇怪的是,在公元前400年,雅典卫城的许多纪念碑或多或少是看不见的。可见性是间接的和偶然的,我将在下面详细说明。由此引出了两个问题:对于一个民主国家来说,其最辉煌的公共纪念碑或多或少都是不可见的,这意味着什么?这对艺术史有什么影响?雅典卫城的遗迹至少有三种不同的隐身方式。首先,字面上的隐形,在闭塞或隐藏的意义上。在这种情况下,任何照射到物体上的光都不会反射回来击中观察者的眼睛。如果一个人把一尊雕像埋在一个洞里,它就会在这个意义上被封闭;雕像真的是隐形的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信