CJEU case law on CHF loans the most important issues still awaiting for the decision (limitation of claims, remuneration for the usage of capital)

Jarosław Ciesielski
{"title":"CJEU case law on CHF loans the most important issues still awaiting for the decision (limitation of claims, remuneration for the usage of capital)","authors":"Jarosław Ciesielski","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.6680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Unfair Contract Terms Directive and provisions of the national law which implement that legal act realize a system of consumer protection against the usage of abusive clauses in contracts concluded by consumers and professionals. The large set of case law provided by the CJEU makes it possible to clarify the principles and scope of the consumers protection. However, it is not comprehensive, as there are still important legal issues that have not been yet resolved by the CJEUs judgements. They concern, in particular, such important issues for borrowers as determining the beginning of the limitation period for claims of the parties to the contract, as well as assessing the legitimacy of the lenders' claims for payment of remuneration for the use of the capital of the loan, which had been paid on the basis of a contract which has been declared void. That issues are addressed by references in preliminary ruling proceedings, currently conducted before the CJEU on the basis of questions submitted by Polish courts, in cases concerning borrowers. Examination of these questions leads to the conclusion, that the Court probably will take a pro-consumer position on these key issues, consistently advocating for the broad protection of the weaker party to the contract.","PeriodicalId":403517,"journal":{"name":"Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kwartalnik Prawa Międzynarodowego","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.6680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Unfair Contract Terms Directive and provisions of the national law which implement that legal act realize a system of consumer protection against the usage of abusive clauses in contracts concluded by consumers and professionals. The large set of case law provided by the CJEU makes it possible to clarify the principles and scope of the consumers protection. However, it is not comprehensive, as there are still important legal issues that have not been yet resolved by the CJEUs judgements. They concern, in particular, such important issues for borrowers as determining the beginning of the limitation period for claims of the parties to the contract, as well as assessing the legitimacy of the lenders' claims for payment of remuneration for the use of the capital of the loan, which had been paid on the basis of a contract which has been declared void. That issues are addressed by references in preliminary ruling proceedings, currently conducted before the CJEU on the basis of questions submitted by Polish courts, in cases concerning borrowers. Examination of these questions leads to the conclusion, that the Court probably will take a pro-consumer position on these key issues, consistently advocating for the broad protection of the weaker party to the contract.
欧洲法院关于瑞士法郎贷款的判例法——仍待裁决的最重要问题(索赔限制、资本使用报酬)
《不公平合同条款指令》和实施该法律行为的国内法规定实现了一种防止消费者和专业人员在合同中使用滥用条款的消费者保护制度。欧洲法院提供的大量判例法使消费者保护的原则和范围得以明确。然而,它并不全面,因为仍有重要的法律问题尚未得到法院判决的解决。它们特别涉及借款人的一些重要问题,如确定合同各方索赔的时效期的开始,以及评估出借人要求支付使用贷款资金的报酬的合法性,这些报酬是根据一项已被宣布无效的合同支付的。这些问题是在初步裁决程序中提到的,目前在欧洲法院审理有关借款人的案件时,这些程序是根据波兰法院提出的问题进行的。对这些问题的审查得出的结论是,法院可能会在这些关键问题上采取支持消费者的立场,一贯主张对合同中较弱的一方进行广泛保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信