Freud's Disavowal of Adler and Adler's Subsequent Influence on Psychoanalytic Thought

R. Watts, N. Thorne, Marina Bluvshtein
{"title":"Freud's Disavowal of Adler and Adler's Subsequent Influence on Psychoanalytic Thought","authors":"R. Watts, N. Thorne, Marina Bluvshtein","doi":"10.1353/jip.2022.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:There are many different explanations of the relationship between Alfred Adler and Sigmund Freud, and two are the most notable. Adler asserted he was never a disciple of Freud, and Freud maintained that Adler was his follower who broke away from him. However, the truth is much more complicated. Because of political strategies and other factors, the narrative has changed over time, morphing from the original true story, which is that Freud and Adler disagreed about many aspects of the two theories of psychoanalysis and Adler's own Individual Psychology, and that eventually led to Freud's calculated disavowal of Adler in 1911. Through the careful exploration of available contemporary texts and archival data, mainly from the Minutes of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society and other correspondence, Adler and Freud's complex personal relationship and theoretical disagreements can be traced throughout the years.","PeriodicalId":410014,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Individual Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Individual Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jip.2022.0046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:There are many different explanations of the relationship between Alfred Adler and Sigmund Freud, and two are the most notable. Adler asserted he was never a disciple of Freud, and Freud maintained that Adler was his follower who broke away from him. However, the truth is much more complicated. Because of political strategies and other factors, the narrative has changed over time, morphing from the original true story, which is that Freud and Adler disagreed about many aspects of the two theories of psychoanalysis and Adler's own Individual Psychology, and that eventually led to Freud's calculated disavowal of Adler in 1911. Through the careful exploration of available contemporary texts and archival data, mainly from the Minutes of the Vienna Psychoanalytic Society and other correspondence, Adler and Freud's complex personal relationship and theoretical disagreements can be traced throughout the years.
弗洛伊德对阿德勒的否定及阿德勒对精神分析思想的后续影响
摘要:关于阿德勒与弗洛伊德之间的关系,有许多不同的解释,其中最引人注目的有两种。阿德勒坚称自己从来不是弗洛伊德的门徒,弗洛伊德则坚称阿德勒是脱离他的追随者。然而,事实要复杂得多。由于政治策略和其他因素,叙述随着时间的推移而发生了变化,从最初的真实故事演变而来,即弗洛伊德和阿德勒在精神分析和阿德勒自己的个体心理学两种理论的许多方面存在分歧,这最终导致弗洛伊德在1911年有意地与阿德勒断绝关系。通过对现有的当代文本和档案数据的仔细探索,主要来自维也纳精神分析学会的会议记录和其他通信,阿德勒和弗洛伊德复杂的个人关系和理论分歧可以追溯到多年来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信