An Exploratory Study on the Occurrence of Self-Admitted Technical Debt in Android Apps

Gregory Wilder, Riley Miyamoto, Samuel Watson, R. Kazman, Anthony Peruma
{"title":"An Exploratory Study on the Occurrence of Self-Admitted Technical Debt in Android Apps","authors":"Gregory Wilder, Riley Miyamoto, Samuel Watson, R. Kazman, Anthony Peruma","doi":"10.1109/TechDebt59074.2023.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technical debt describes situations where developers write less-than-optimal code to meet project milestones. However, this debt accumulation often results in future developer effort to live with or fix these quality issues. To better manage this debt, developers may document their sub-optimal code as comments in the code (i.e., self-admitted technical debt or SATD). While prior research has investigated the occurrence and characteristics of SATD, this research has primarily focused on non-mobile systems. With millions of mobile applications (apps) in multiple genres available for end-users, there is a lack of research on sub-optimal code developers intentionally implement in mobile apps.In this study, we examine the occurrence and characteristics of SATD in 15,614 open-source Android apps. Our findings show that even though such apps contain occurrences of SATD, the volume per app (a median of 4) is lower than in non-mobile systems, with most debt categorized as Code Debt. Additionally, we identify typical elements in an app that are prone to intentional sub-optimal implementations. We envision our findings supporting researchers and tool vendors with building tools and techniques to support app developers with app maintenance.","PeriodicalId":131882,"journal":{"name":"2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Technical Debt (TechDebt)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TechDebt59074.2023.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technical debt describes situations where developers write less-than-optimal code to meet project milestones. However, this debt accumulation often results in future developer effort to live with or fix these quality issues. To better manage this debt, developers may document their sub-optimal code as comments in the code (i.e., self-admitted technical debt or SATD). While prior research has investigated the occurrence and characteristics of SATD, this research has primarily focused on non-mobile systems. With millions of mobile applications (apps) in multiple genres available for end-users, there is a lack of research on sub-optimal code developers intentionally implement in mobile apps.In this study, we examine the occurrence and characteristics of SATD in 15,614 open-source Android apps. Our findings show that even though such apps contain occurrences of SATD, the volume per app (a median of 4) is lower than in non-mobile systems, with most debt categorized as Code Debt. Additionally, we identify typical elements in an app that are prone to intentional sub-optimal implementations. We envision our findings supporting researchers and tool vendors with building tools and techniques to support app developers with app maintenance.
Android应用中自认技术债发生的探索性研究
技术债务描述了开发人员为满足项目里程碑而编写的代码不够理想的情况。然而,这种债务积累往往会导致未来开发者不得不努力解决这些质量问题。为了更好地管理这种债务,开发人员可能会将他们的次优代码作为代码注释记录下来(即,自我承认的技术债务或SATD)。虽然之前的研究已经调查了SATD的发生和特征,但本研究主要集中在非移动系统上。终端用户可以使用数以百万计的多种类型的移动应用程序,但对于开发者有意在移动应用中执行的次优代码,却缺乏研究。在这项研究中,我们研究了15614个开源Android应用中SATD的发生和特征。我们的研究结果表明,尽管此类应用包含SATD,但每个应用的数量(中位数为4)低于非移动系统,大多数债务被归类为代码债务。此外,我们还确定了应用程序中容易出现故意次优实现的典型元素。我们希望我们的研究结果能够支持研究人员和工具供应商构建工具和技术,以支持应用程序开发人员进行应用程序维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信