Teacher Round Table

Shelly K. Unsicker-Durham, Shaista Fenwick, Najah Amatullah Hylton, Suzanne Sutton, Connor Woodard
{"title":"Teacher Round Table","authors":"Shelly K. Unsicker-Durham, Shaista Fenwick, Najah Amatullah Hylton, Suzanne Sutton, Connor Woodard","doi":"10.15763/issn.2376-5275.2021.5.1.128-152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Study and Scrutiny has focused on the publication of critical and empirical studies surrounding the scholarship and critical merits of Young Adult literature. Because other journals provide a space for pedagogical practices concerning YA, the editors have intentionally shied away from explaining to teachers how to teach a particular title in a particular way. Still, the intention of the journal has been, in part, to support the learning of secondary students as readers and the classroom practices of their teachers. This section hopes to serve as a space to open the conversation surrounding YA literature, its critical merits, and ways that the research might serve teachers as they make curriculum choices about both texts and strategies. The idea is to bring teachers, as intellectuals, into conversation surrounding the scholarship of a featured study. For this issue, four Oklahoma teachers from four different school districts focus on Arianna Banack’s article “Connecting and Critiquing the Canon: Pairing Pride and Pride and Prejudice.” ","PeriodicalId":167058,"journal":{"name":"Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Study and Scrutiny: Research on Young Adult Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2376-5275.2021.5.1.128-152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study and Scrutiny has focused on the publication of critical and empirical studies surrounding the scholarship and critical merits of Young Adult literature. Because other journals provide a space for pedagogical practices concerning YA, the editors have intentionally shied away from explaining to teachers how to teach a particular title in a particular way. Still, the intention of the journal has been, in part, to support the learning of secondary students as readers and the classroom practices of their teachers. This section hopes to serve as a space to open the conversation surrounding YA literature, its critical merits, and ways that the research might serve teachers as they make curriculum choices about both texts and strategies. The idea is to bring teachers, as intellectuals, into conversation surrounding the scholarship of a featured study. For this issue, four Oklahoma teachers from four different school districts focus on Arianna Banack’s article “Connecting and Critiquing the Canon: Pairing Pride and Pride and Prejudice.” 
教师圆桌会议
《研究与审视》专注于围绕青少年文学的学术和批判价值发表批判性和实证研究。由于其他期刊为青少年文学的教学实践提供了空间,编辑们故意避免向教师解释如何以特定的方式教授特定的标题。尽管如此,这本杂志的部分目的是支持中学生作为读者的学习和他们的老师的课堂实践。本节希望作为一个空间,打开围绕青少年文学的对话,它的关键优点,以及研究可能为教师提供关于文本和策略的课程选择的方式。这样做的目的是让教师作为知识分子,参与到围绕某一专题研究的学术讨论中来。在本期中,来自四个不同学区的四位俄克拉何马州教师专注于Arianna Banack的文章“连接和批评经典:将傲慢与傲慢与偏见配对”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信