Catching Up or Crowding Out? The Crowd-Out Effects of Catch-Up Retirement Contributions on Non-Retirement Saving

Lucas W. Goodman
{"title":"Catching Up or Crowding Out? The Crowd-Out Effects of Catch-Up Retirement Contributions on Non-Retirement Saving","authors":"Lucas W. Goodman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3532426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using tax data, this paper exploits a discontinuous increase in retirement contribution limits based on exact date of birth. This paper finds clear evidence that constrained individuals increase their retirement saving when so eligible, but finds no evidence suggesting that non-retirement saving falls. In the baseline specifications, one can rule out crowd-out greater than approximately 0.38 to 0.57 at the 95% confidence level depending on the measure used. This suggests that the additional contributions induced by catch-up eligibility represent an increase in total private saving.","PeriodicalId":407792,"journal":{"name":"Pension Risk Management eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pension Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3532426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract Using tax data, this paper exploits a discontinuous increase in retirement contribution limits based on exact date of birth. This paper finds clear evidence that constrained individuals increase their retirement saving when so eligible, but finds no evidence suggesting that non-retirement saving falls. In the baseline specifications, one can rule out crowd-out greater than approximately 0.38 to 0.57 at the 95% confidence level depending on the measure used. This suggests that the additional contributions induced by catch-up eligibility represent an increase in total private saving.
追赶还是排挤?追赶退休供款对非退休储蓄的挤出效应
摘要:本文利用税收数据,利用基于确切出生日期的退休供款限额的不连续增长。本文找到了明确的证据,表明受约束的个人在符合条件的情况下会增加退休储蓄,但没有证据表明非退休储蓄会下降。在基线规范中,根据所使用的测量方法,可以在95%置信水平上排除大于约0.38至0.57的挤出。这表明,由赶超资格引起的额外缴款代表私人储蓄总额的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信