Where Have They Gone? Changes In Occupations Using 1991-2013 New Zealand Census Data

Andrew Hancock
{"title":"Where Have They Gone? Changes In Occupations Using 1991-2013 New Zealand Census Data","authors":"Andrew Hancock","doi":"10.26686/LEW.V0I0.2217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the period 1991 to 2013 they way in which occupations have been reported and classified in the New Zealand Census of Population and Dwellings has changed. To look at the high level trends, an analysis of the top thirty occupations that have the highest counts in census data in that time period based on the New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (NZSCO) has been undertaken. The purpose of this analysis is to have a time-series barometer to see whether respondents change the way in which they respond, and to determine if occupation reporting is reflecting changes in the real world of the New Zealand labour market. A comparison is made using the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) to identify if classification changes have an impact. Have some of the old occupations really disappeared or are they being reported differently? Has the way the occupations are classified, and the changes in the classifications caused some interesting trends. What impact has been experienced with the introduction of a trans-Tasman classification? Are there new and emerging occupations in this top group and are there any labour market sectors that are not appropriately represented? The paper discusses the role of an occupational classification in relation to the processing of the responses given to the five yearly population census question on occupation, and questions whether the statistical need for processing survey responses has affected the viability of the classification for labour market analysis.","PeriodicalId":130683,"journal":{"name":"Labour, Employment and Work in New Zealand","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour, Employment and Work in New Zealand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/LEW.V0I0.2217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Over the period 1991 to 2013 they way in which occupations have been reported and classified in the New Zealand Census of Population and Dwellings has changed. To look at the high level trends, an analysis of the top thirty occupations that have the highest counts in census data in that time period based on the New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (NZSCO) has been undertaken. The purpose of this analysis is to have a time-series barometer to see whether respondents change the way in which they respond, and to determine if occupation reporting is reflecting changes in the real world of the New Zealand labour market. A comparison is made using the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) to identify if classification changes have an impact. Have some of the old occupations really disappeared or are they being reported differently? Has the way the occupations are classified, and the changes in the classifications caused some interesting trends. What impact has been experienced with the introduction of a trans-Tasman classification? Are there new and emerging occupations in this top group and are there any labour market sectors that are not appropriately represented? The paper discusses the role of an occupational classification in relation to the processing of the responses given to the five yearly population census question on occupation, and questions whether the statistical need for processing survey responses has affected the viability of the classification for labour market analysis.
他们去哪儿了?使用1991-2013年新西兰人口普查数据的职业变化
在1991年至2013年期间,新西兰人口和住房普查中职业报告和分类的方式发生了变化。为了观察高水平的趋势,根据新西兰标准职业分类(NZSCO),对该时期人口普查数据中数量最多的前30个职业进行了分析。这个分析的目的是有一个时间序列晴雨表,看看受访者是否改变了他们的反应方式,并确定职业报告是否反映了新西兰劳动力市场现实世界的变化。使用澳大利亚和新西兰标准职业分类(ANZSCO)进行比较,以确定分类变化是否有影响。一些旧的职业真的消失了吗,还是它们被报道得不一样了?职业分类的方式,分类的变化引起了一些有趣的趋势。引进跨塔斯曼分类有什么影响?在这个最高的群体中是否有新的和新兴的职业,是否有任何劳动力市场领域没有得到适当的代表?本文讨论职业分类在处理五年一次的人口普查有关职业的问题的答复方面的作用,并质疑处理调查答复的统计需要是否影响了分类用于劳动力市场分析的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信