A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Batteries for Internet-of-Things Applications

Alberto Bocca, Yukai Chen, A. Macii, E. Macii, M. Poncino
{"title":"A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Batteries for Internet-of-Things Applications","authors":"Alberto Bocca, Yukai Chen, A. Macii, E. Macii, M. Poncino","doi":"10.23919/AEIT56783.2022.9951716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The proliferation of wireless IoT devices has caused the energy cost to become an additional figure of merit in designing low-cost and ultra-low-power sensors. This article presents a methodology for a cost-benefit analysis of the battery subsystem for IoT devices. In particular, it analyzes the costs/service time tradeoff of two primary (i.e., non-rechargeable) batteries of different chemistries: the Energizer E91 alkaline cell (zinc-manganese dioxide, Zn/MnO2) and the Energizer L91 lithium cell (lithium/iron disulfide, Li/FeS2). Although the latter shows a high and very stable performance in terms of total capacity, at different constant and pulse discharge currents, the former shows a significant capacity recovery during the rest times between consecutive pulses. Consequently, the total service time of the E91 differs for different continuous and pulse currents. Results show that the overall cost of a specific choice of a battery needs to be assessed by considering its service time for a given application domain.","PeriodicalId":253384,"journal":{"name":"2022 AEIT International Annual Conference (AEIT)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 AEIT International Annual Conference (AEIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/AEIT56783.2022.9951716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proliferation of wireless IoT devices has caused the energy cost to become an additional figure of merit in designing low-cost and ultra-low-power sensors. This article presents a methodology for a cost-benefit analysis of the battery subsystem for IoT devices. In particular, it analyzes the costs/service time tradeoff of two primary (i.e., non-rechargeable) batteries of different chemistries: the Energizer E91 alkaline cell (zinc-manganese dioxide, Zn/MnO2) and the Energizer L91 lithium cell (lithium/iron disulfide, Li/FeS2). Although the latter shows a high and very stable performance in terms of total capacity, at different constant and pulse discharge currents, the former shows a significant capacity recovery during the rest times between consecutive pulses. Consequently, the total service time of the E91 differs for different continuous and pulse currents. Results show that the overall cost of a specific choice of a battery needs to be assessed by considering its service time for a given application domain.
物联网应用电池的成本效益分析
无线物联网设备的激增使得能源成本成为设计低成本和超低功耗传感器的另一个优点。本文提出了一种物联网设备电池子系统的成本效益分析方法。特别地,它分析了两种不同化学成分的原电池(即不可充电电池)的成本/使用时间权衡:Energizer E91碱性电池(锌-二氧化锰,Zn/MnO2)和Energizer L91锂电池(锂/二硫化铁,Li/FeS2)。尽管后者在总容量方面表现出很高且非常稳定的性能,但在不同的恒定和脉冲放电电流下,前者在连续脉冲之间的休息时间内表现出显着的容量恢复。因此,E91的总工作时间对于不同的连续电流和脉冲电流是不同的。结果表明,特定选择的电池的总体成本需要通过考虑其在给定应用领域的使用时间来评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信