Simulation study of estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analyses of log-response-ratio for normal data

Ilyas Bakbergenuly, D. Hoaglin, E. Kulinskaya
{"title":"Simulation study of estimating between-study variance and overall effect in meta-analyses of log-response-ratio for normal data","authors":"Ilyas Bakbergenuly, D. Hoaglin, E. Kulinskaya","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/3bnxs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methods for random-effects meta-analysis require an estimate of the between-study variance, $\\tau^2$. The performance of estimators of $\\tau^2$ (measured by bias and coverage) affects their usefulness in assessing heterogeneity of study-level effects, and also the performance of related estimators of the overall effect. For the effect measure log-response-ratio (LRR, also known as the logarithm of the ratio of means, RoM), we review four point estimators of $\\tau^2$ (the popular methods of DerSimonian-Laird (DL), restricted maximum likelihood, and Mandel and Paule (MP), and the less-familiar method of Jackson), four interval estimators for $\\tau^2$ (profile likelihood, Q-profile, Biggerstaff and Jackson, and Jackson), five point estimators of the overall effect (the four related to the point estimators of $\\tau^2$ and an estimator whose weights use only study-level sample sizes), and seven interval estimators for the overall effect (four based on the point estimators for $\\tau^2$, the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) interval, a modification of HKSJ that uses the MP estimator of $\\tau^2$ instead of the DL estimator, and an interval based on the sample-size-weighted estimator). We obtain empirical evidence from extensive simulations of data from normal distributions. Simulations from lognormal distributions are in a separate report Bakbergenuly et al. 2019b.","PeriodicalId":186390,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Methodology","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/3bnxs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Methods for random-effects meta-analysis require an estimate of the between-study variance, $\tau^2$. The performance of estimators of $\tau^2$ (measured by bias and coverage) affects their usefulness in assessing heterogeneity of study-level effects, and also the performance of related estimators of the overall effect. For the effect measure log-response-ratio (LRR, also known as the logarithm of the ratio of means, RoM), we review four point estimators of $\tau^2$ (the popular methods of DerSimonian-Laird (DL), restricted maximum likelihood, and Mandel and Paule (MP), and the less-familiar method of Jackson), four interval estimators for $\tau^2$ (profile likelihood, Q-profile, Biggerstaff and Jackson, and Jackson), five point estimators of the overall effect (the four related to the point estimators of $\tau^2$ and an estimator whose weights use only study-level sample sizes), and seven interval estimators for the overall effect (four based on the point estimators for $\tau^2$, the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman (HKSJ) interval, a modification of HKSJ that uses the MP estimator of $\tau^2$ instead of the DL estimator, and an interval based on the sample-size-weighted estimator). We obtain empirical evidence from extensive simulations of data from normal distributions. Simulations from lognormal distributions are in a separate report Bakbergenuly et al. 2019b.
正常数据对数响应比荟萃分析中估计研究间方差和总体效应的模拟研究
随机效应荟萃分析的方法需要估计研究间方差,$\tau^2$。$\tau^2$的估计量(通过偏倚和覆盖测量)的性能影响它们在评估研究水平效应的异质性方面的有用性,以及总体效应的相关估计量的性能。对于效应测量对数响应比(LRR,也称为均值比的对数,RoM),我们回顾了$\tau^2$的四个点估计量(流行的dersimonan - laird (DL)方法,限制最大似然,Mandel和Paule (MP)方法,以及不太熟悉的Jackson方法),$\tau^2$的四个区间估计量(似然,Q-profile, Biggerstaff和Jackson, Jackson),整体效果的5个点估计(其中4个与$\tau^2$的点估计和一个权重仅使用研究水平样本大小的估计有关),以及整体效果的7个区间估计(其中4个基于$\tau^2$的点估计、hartung - knappp - sidik - jonkman (HKSJ)区间,HKSJ的一种修改,使用$\tau^2$的MP估计而不是DL估计,以及一个基于样本大小加权估计的区间)。我们从正态分布数据的大量模拟中获得经验证据。对数正态分布的模拟见Bakbergenuly et al. 2019b的另一份报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信