Influence of mild to severe flow alterations on invertebrates in three mountain streams

R. Rader, Timberley A. Belish
{"title":"Influence of mild to severe flow alterations on invertebrates in three mountain streams","authors":"R. Rader, Timberley A. Belish","doi":"10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199907/08)15:4<353::AID-RRR551>3.0.CO;2-U","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Invertebrates were compared upstream versus downstream from diversions on three small, headwater streams in the central Rocky Mountains, USA. Flow alteration of these streams varied from mild (some aspect of all natural flow components was transferred downstream) to severe (nearly 100% of the flow was diverted for 10–11 months of the year). The analysis was separated into periods of frequent (diversion gates often opened and closed; April–October) and infrequent flow fluctuations (stable low flows due to constant diversion; November–March). Invertebrates appeared resilient to mild flow alterations as neither the abundance, diversity, nor spatial and temporal variation in abundance and diversity differed upstream versus downstream during either period. In severely diverted streams, however, total invertebrate density downstream from the diversion was only 50% of upstream. Invertebrate diversity was also reduced; ten taxa abundant upstream were absent in downstream sections. Chironomids, ostracods and Ameletus spp. comprised 80% of total invertebrate density during constant, low flow conditions in the severely diverted streams. Although all taxa in the severely diverted streams recovered (drift) during the period of frequent flow fluctuations, spatial and temporal variation (coefficient of variation) in both density and the number of taxa was significantly greater downstream. Depending on the frequency with which free-flowing conditions were re-established, many invertebrate populations (especially mayflies and some stoneflies) declined or were even locally extirpated (e.g. Hesperoperlapacifica, Megarcyssignata, Neothremmaalicia, Polyceliscoronata). Downstream communities in severely diverted tributaries appeared to fluctuate between two stable endpoints; a depauperate low-flow community dominated by chironomids and ostracods and a more abundant and diverse natural-flow community dominated by mayflies, chironomids, ostracods, stoneflies and caddisflies. Water abstraction (extent and timing of diversion) could be managed to minimize risks to downstream ecological resources.","PeriodicalId":306887,"journal":{"name":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"107","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulated Rivers-research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199907/08)15:4<353::AID-RRR551>3.0.CO;2-U","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 107

Abstract

Invertebrates were compared upstream versus downstream from diversions on three small, headwater streams in the central Rocky Mountains, USA. Flow alteration of these streams varied from mild (some aspect of all natural flow components was transferred downstream) to severe (nearly 100% of the flow was diverted for 10–11 months of the year). The analysis was separated into periods of frequent (diversion gates often opened and closed; April–October) and infrequent flow fluctuations (stable low flows due to constant diversion; November–March). Invertebrates appeared resilient to mild flow alterations as neither the abundance, diversity, nor spatial and temporal variation in abundance and diversity differed upstream versus downstream during either period. In severely diverted streams, however, total invertebrate density downstream from the diversion was only 50% of upstream. Invertebrate diversity was also reduced; ten taxa abundant upstream were absent in downstream sections. Chironomids, ostracods and Ameletus spp. comprised 80% of total invertebrate density during constant, low flow conditions in the severely diverted streams. Although all taxa in the severely diverted streams recovered (drift) during the period of frequent flow fluctuations, spatial and temporal variation (coefficient of variation) in both density and the number of taxa was significantly greater downstream. Depending on the frequency with which free-flowing conditions were re-established, many invertebrate populations (especially mayflies and some stoneflies) declined or were even locally extirpated (e.g. Hesperoperlapacifica, Megarcyssignata, Neothremmaalicia, Polyceliscoronata). Downstream communities in severely diverted tributaries appeared to fluctuate between two stable endpoints; a depauperate low-flow community dominated by chironomids and ostracods and a more abundant and diverse natural-flow community dominated by mayflies, chironomids, ostracods, stoneflies and caddisflies. Water abstraction (extent and timing of diversion) could be managed to minimize risks to downstream ecological resources.
3条山涧中重度流量变化对无脊椎动物的影响
在美国落基山脉中部的三个小源头溪流上,对上游和下游的无脊椎动物进行了比较。这些河流的流量变化从轻微(所有自然流量成分的某些方面转移到下游)到严重(一年中10-11个月几乎100%的流量被转移)不等。分析分为频繁时期(导流闸门经常打开和关闭;4月至10月),流量波动不频繁(由于不断改道,流量稳定低;November-March)。无脊椎动物对温和的流量变化表现出弹性,在两个时间段内,上游和下游的丰度和多样性以及空间和时间变化都没有差异。然而,在严重改道的河流中,改道下游的无脊椎动物总密度仅为上游的50%。无脊椎动物的多样性也减少了;上游丰富的10个类群在下游缺失。在严重改道的河流中,在恒定、低流量条件下,摇尾虫、介形虫和阿梅勒斯类占无脊椎动物总密度的80%。严重改道河道中所有类群在流量波动频繁期均有恢复(漂移),但下游类群密度和数量的时空变异(变异系数)显著大于下游。根据重新建立自由流动条件的频率,许多无脊椎动物种群(特别是蜉蝣和一些石蝇)减少或甚至局部灭绝(例如,Hesperoperlapacifica, Megarcyssignata, neothermaalicia, Polyceliscoronata)。严重改道支流的下游群落似乎在两个稳定的端点之间波动;一个以手摇虫和介形虫为主的低流量群落和一个以蜉蝣、手摇虫、介形虫、石蝇和球蝇为主的丰富多样的自然流量群落。可以对取水(取水的范围和时间)进行管理,以尽量减少对下游生态资源的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信