Induction after Electromagnetism

Kieran Murphy
{"title":"Induction after Electromagnetism","authors":"Kieran Murphy","doi":"10.1515/9783110481112-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Faraday ’ s discovery of electromagnetic induction transformed the world by providing the blueprint for the mass production of electricity and a new type of motor that replaced the steam engine as the main driving force of the global economy. Electromagnetic induction presented a new set of physical problems whose solutions undermined the theoretical framework of Newtonian physics and redefined the nature of inductive reasoning. As the main logical inference characterizing the natural sciences, induction has been the subject of numerous philosophical debates about its definition and scientific value. In this paper, I trace a lesser-known contribution to these debates that developed in the wake of the epistemological changes instigated by the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction and that, through Einstein ’ s and Bachelard ’ s achievements, changed the modern conceptions of science, discovery, and history. I also argue that these achievements are inscribed in a tradition that should in-clude Balzac ’ s pioneering use of electromagnetic induction to convey the elusive nature of scientific discovery. in the case where an electric field is produced by electromagnetic induction, the gravitational field similarly has only a relative existence. Thus, for an observer in free fall from the roof of a house there exists, during his fall, no gravitational field – at least not in his immediate vicinity. If the observer releases any objects, they will remain, relative to him, in a state of rest [ … ]. There is no transition from the system of Newton to the system of Einstein. One does not proceed from the first to the second by amassing data, perfecting measurements, and making slight adjustments to first principles. What is needed is some totally new ingredi-ent. It is a ‘ transcendental induction ’ and not an ‘ amplifying induction ’ that leads the way from classical to relativistic physics. 15","PeriodicalId":167138,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Literature","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110481112-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Faraday ’ s discovery of electromagnetic induction transformed the world by providing the blueprint for the mass production of electricity and a new type of motor that replaced the steam engine as the main driving force of the global economy. Electromagnetic induction presented a new set of physical problems whose solutions undermined the theoretical framework of Newtonian physics and redefined the nature of inductive reasoning. As the main logical inference characterizing the natural sciences, induction has been the subject of numerous philosophical debates about its definition and scientific value. In this paper, I trace a lesser-known contribution to these debates that developed in the wake of the epistemological changes instigated by the phenomenon of electromagnetic induction and that, through Einstein ’ s and Bachelard ’ s achievements, changed the modern conceptions of science, discovery, and history. I also argue that these achievements are inscribed in a tradition that should in-clude Balzac ’ s pioneering use of electromagnetic induction to convey the elusive nature of scientific discovery. in the case where an electric field is produced by electromagnetic induction, the gravitational field similarly has only a relative existence. Thus, for an observer in free fall from the roof of a house there exists, during his fall, no gravitational field – at least not in his immediate vicinity. If the observer releases any objects, they will remain, relative to him, in a state of rest [ … ]. There is no transition from the system of Newton to the system of Einstein. One does not proceed from the first to the second by amassing data, perfecting measurements, and making slight adjustments to first principles. What is needed is some totally new ingredi-ent. It is a ‘ transcendental induction ’ and not an ‘ amplifying induction ’ that leads the way from classical to relativistic physics. 15
电磁后感应
法拉第电磁感应的发现改变了世界,为大规模生产电力提供了蓝图,并发明了一种新型电动机,取代了蒸汽机,成为全球经济的主要动力。电磁感应提出了一系列新的物理问题,其解决方案破坏了牛顿物理学的理论框架,并重新定义了归纳推理的本质。作为表征自然科学的主要逻辑推理,归纳法一直是关于其定义和科学价值的众多哲学争论的主题。在这篇论文中,我追溯了在电磁感应现象引发的认识论变化之后发展起来的这些辩论中一个鲜为人知的贡献,通过爱因斯坦和巴舍拉的成就,改变了现代科学、发现和历史的概念。我还认为,这些成就是在一种传统中留下的,这种传统应该包括巴尔扎克开创性地使用电磁感应来传达科学发现的难以捉摸的本质。在电磁感应产生电场的情况下,引力场同样只是相对存在。因此,对于一个从屋顶上自由落体的观察者来说,在他落体的过程中,不存在引力场——至少在他的附近没有。如果观察者释放任何物体,它们将相对于他保持静止状态[…]。没有从牛顿体系到爱因斯坦体系的过渡。一个人不可能通过积累数据、完善测量、对基本原理做微小的调整来从第一种情况发展到第二种情况。我们需要的是一种全新的成分。这是一种“先验归纳法”,而不是一种“放大归纳法”,它引领着从经典物理学到相对论物理学的道路。15
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信