Systematic Review of Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy Techniques, Outcomes and Biomechanical Testing Parameters: A Critical Appraisal

H. Hassan
{"title":"Systematic Review of Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy Techniques, Outcomes and Biomechanical Testing Parameters: A Critical Appraisal","authors":"H. Hassan","doi":"10.46889/josr.2023.4106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The leading cause of pain and incapacity in elderly women is Osteoarthritis (OA). It affects females more frequently than males. The quantity and quality of coping resources that a person may have at their disposal affect the coping style they ultimately choose. The purpose of this study was to examine how the socio-demographic features of older women in Beni-Suef city who were experiencing knee Osteoarthritis (OA) pain affected their coping mechanisms.\n\nDesign: The current study used a descriptive cross-sectional research design. The investigation was conducted in the orthopaedics outpatient clinic and the physiotherapy unit at Beni-Suef University Hospital.\n\nSubjects: In the current study, 300 studied women were recruited using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique.\n\nTools: Pain Coping Inventory (PCI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Interview Questionnaire\n\nResults: Based on the visual analogue scale for measuring pain intensity. It demonstrates that 50% of the older women in the study had low coping skills, 49.3% experienced moderate pain, 50.3% had moderate and 50.3% had severe pain. Younger (65-70 years old), women with intermediate education (38.5% and 32.7%), women who were retired and unemployed (48.1% and 32.7%), married (92.3%), women who lived in rural areas (53.8%) and elderly adult women with an adequate family income (92.3%) were more likely to use high levels of coping strategies. There was a positive association between pain level and activities of daily life (r= 0.109 and p= 0.05) and a severe negative link between the overall pain coping inventory and degree of pain (r= -0.280 and p= 0.000).\n\nConclusion: Age, educational attainment, employment position and marital status all significantly influenced how well older women coped with pain. Even Nevertheless, there was a statistically significant correlation between the ability of older women to cope with pain and their monthly income and area of residence. The overall pain coping inventory and the visual analogue scale were shown to have a substantial negative connection. While the Katz scale for ADL and the pain coping inventory showed a positive association.","PeriodicalId":382112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science and Research","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46889/josr.2023.4106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The leading cause of pain and incapacity in elderly women is Osteoarthritis (OA). It affects females more frequently than males. The quantity and quality of coping resources that a person may have at their disposal affect the coping style they ultimately choose. The purpose of this study was to examine how the socio-demographic features of older women in Beni-Suef city who were experiencing knee Osteoarthritis (OA) pain affected their coping mechanisms. Design: The current study used a descriptive cross-sectional research design. The investigation was conducted in the orthopaedics outpatient clinic and the physiotherapy unit at Beni-Suef University Hospital. Subjects: In the current study, 300 studied women were recruited using a non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Tools: Pain Coping Inventory (PCI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Interview Questionnaire Results: Based on the visual analogue scale for measuring pain intensity. It demonstrates that 50% of the older women in the study had low coping skills, 49.3% experienced moderate pain, 50.3% had moderate and 50.3% had severe pain. Younger (65-70 years old), women with intermediate education (38.5% and 32.7%), women who were retired and unemployed (48.1% and 32.7%), married (92.3%), women who lived in rural areas (53.8%) and elderly adult women with an adequate family income (92.3%) were more likely to use high levels of coping strategies. There was a positive association between pain level and activities of daily life (r= 0.109 and p= 0.05) and a severe negative link between the overall pain coping inventory and degree of pain (r= -0.280 and p= 0.000). Conclusion: Age, educational attainment, employment position and marital status all significantly influenced how well older women coped with pain. Even Nevertheless, there was a statistically significant correlation between the ability of older women to cope with pain and their monthly income and area of residence. The overall pain coping inventory and the visual analogue scale were shown to have a substantial negative connection. While the Katz scale for ADL and the pain coping inventory showed a positive association.
小结节截骨技术的系统回顾,结果和生物力学测试参数:一个关键的评价
背景:老年女性疼痛和丧失工作能力的主要原因是骨关节炎(OA)。它对女性的影响比男性更频繁。一个人可以支配的应对资源的数量和质量会影响他们最终选择的应对方式。本研究旨在探讨Beni-Suef市老年女性膝关节骨关节炎(OA)疼痛的社会人口学特征如何影响她们的应对机制。设计:本研究采用描述性横断面研究设计。调查是在贝尼-苏夫大学医院骨科门诊和理疗科进行的。对象:在目前的研究中,使用非概率连续抽样技术招募了300名研究女性。工具:疼痛应对量表(PCI)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和访谈问卷。结果:采用视觉模拟量表测量疼痛强度。研究表明,50%的老年妇女的应对技能较低,49.3%的人有中度疼痛,50.3%的人有中度疼痛,50.3%的人有重度疼痛。较年轻(65-70岁)、受过中等教育的妇女(38.5%和32.7%)、退休和失业妇女(48.1%和32.7%)、已婚妇女(92.3%)、生活在农村地区的妇女(53.8%)和家庭收入充足的老年成年妇女(92.3%)更有可能使用高水平的应对策略。疼痛水平与日常生活活动呈正相关(r= 0.109, p= 0.05),总体疼痛应对量表与疼痛程度呈显著负相关(r= -0.280, p= 0.000)。结论:年龄、受教育程度、就业地位和婚姻状况对老年妇女的疼痛应对能力有显著影响。尽管如此,老年妇女应对疼痛的能力与她们的月收入和居住地区之间存在统计学上的显著相关性。整体疼痛应对量表与视觉模拟量表呈显著负相关。而卡茨量表与疼痛应对量表呈显著正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信