Credit Reporting, Relationship Banking, and Loan Repayment

Martin Brown, Christian Zehnder
{"title":"Credit Reporting, Relationship Banking, and Loan Repayment","authors":"Martin Brown, Christian Zehnder","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.968387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the impact of credit reporting on the repayment behavior of borrowers. We implement an experimental credit market in which loan repayment is not third-party enforceable. We then compare market outcome with a public credit registry to that without a credit registry. This experiment is conducted for two market environments: first, a market in which repeat interaction between borrowers and lenders is not feasible and, second, a market in which borrowers and lenders can choose to trade repeatedly with each other. In the market without repeat interaction the credit market collapses without a credit registry, as lenders rightly fear that borrowers will default. The introduction of a registry in this environment significantly raises repayment rates and the credit volume extended by lenders. When repeat transactions are possible a credit registry is not necessary to sustain high market performance as relationship banking enforces repayment even when lenders cannot share information. In this environment credit reporting has little impact on market efficiency, it does however affect trading structure and distribution. The presence of a credit registry leads to fewer banking relationships and reduces the ability of lenders to extract rents from such relationships.","PeriodicalId":354311,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Credit Reporting (Sub-Topic)","volume":"308 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"226","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Credit Reporting (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.968387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 226

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of credit reporting on the repayment behavior of borrowers. We implement an experimental credit market in which loan repayment is not third-party enforceable. We then compare market outcome with a public credit registry to that without a credit registry. This experiment is conducted for two market environments: first, a market in which repeat interaction between borrowers and lenders is not feasible and, second, a market in which borrowers and lenders can choose to trade repeatedly with each other. In the market without repeat interaction the credit market collapses without a credit registry, as lenders rightly fear that borrowers will default. The introduction of a registry in this environment significantly raises repayment rates and the credit volume extended by lenders. When repeat transactions are possible a credit registry is not necessary to sustain high market performance as relationship banking enforces repayment even when lenders cannot share information. In this environment credit reporting has little impact on market efficiency, it does however affect trading structure and distribution. The presence of a credit registry leads to fewer banking relationships and reduces the ability of lenders to extract rents from such relationships.
信用报告,关系银行和贷款偿还
本文考察了信用报告对借款人还款行为的影响。我们实施了一个实验性的信贷市场,在这个市场中,贷款偿还不是第三方强制执行的。然后,我们将有公共信用登记的市场结果与没有信用登记的市场结果进行比较。本实验在两种市场环境下进行:第一,借款人和贷款人之间的重复互动是不可行的市场;第二,借款人和贷款人可以选择彼此重复交易的市场。在没有重复互动的市场中,如果没有信用登记,信贷市场就会崩溃,因为贷方理所当然地担心借款人会违约。在这种环境中引入登记制度大大提高了还款率和贷款人提供的信贷量。当可能发生重复交易时,信用登记就没有必要维持较高的市场表现,因为关系银行即使在贷方无法共享信息时也会强制还款。在这种环境下,信用报告对市场效率影响不大,但它确实影响交易结构和分布。信用登记的存在导致银行关系的减少,并降低了贷款人从这些关系中提取租金的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信