Influence a Realistic Mathematics Education Approach and Motivation on Students' Mathematical Reasoning Ability

A. M. M. Purnamatati, H. Usman, Elih Yunianingsih
{"title":"Influence a Realistic Mathematics Education Approach and Motivation on Students' Mathematical Reasoning Ability","authors":"A. M. M. Purnamatati, H. Usman, Elih Yunianingsih","doi":"10.37640/jim.v4i1.1618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the research was to provide knowledge of the effect of the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach and motivation on students' mathematical reasoning abilities. This quasi-experimental study employed a pretest-posttest control group design, focusing on fifth-grade students at SDN Lulut 05, Klapanunggal District. Class VA was selected as the experimental group, while class VB served as the control group using purposive sampling. Data analysis involved the N-gain formula and t-test. The results shown: (1) There is a difference in the increase in students' mathematical reasoning ability after being given the RME approach indicated by the N-gain value of 55.5 in the medium category and for the experimental class 36.8 in the low category, then the control class in the t-test (independent) so that the Sig value is obtained. 0.001<0.005, as for deciding in the independent sample t-test. It is concluded that there is a significant difference between the average score mathematical reasoning ability by students treated with the RME approach and the Conventional approach. (2) There is an influence of the RME approach on students' mathematical reasoning abilities with an effect size score of 1.44 which is in the high category.","PeriodicalId":300273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Instructional Mathematics","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Instructional Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v4i1.1618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the research was to provide knowledge of the effect of the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach and motivation on students' mathematical reasoning abilities. This quasi-experimental study employed a pretest-posttest control group design, focusing on fifth-grade students at SDN Lulut 05, Klapanunggal District. Class VA was selected as the experimental group, while class VB served as the control group using purposive sampling. Data analysis involved the N-gain formula and t-test. The results shown: (1) There is a difference in the increase in students' mathematical reasoning ability after being given the RME approach indicated by the N-gain value of 55.5 in the medium category and for the experimental class 36.8 in the low category, then the control class in the t-test (independent) so that the Sig value is obtained. 0.001<0.005, as for deciding in the independent sample t-test. It is concluded that there is a significant difference between the average score mathematical reasoning ability by students treated with the RME approach and the Conventional approach. (2) There is an influence of the RME approach on students' mathematical reasoning abilities with an effect size score of 1.44 which is in the high category.
现实主义数学教育方法和动机对学生数学推理能力的影响
本研究的目的是提供现实数学教育(RME)方法和动机对学生数学推理能力的影响。本准实验研究采用前测后测控制组设计,以克拉帕永加尔区Lulut 05小学五年级学生为研究对象。选取VA类为实验组,VB类为对照组,目的抽样。数据分析包括n -增益公式和t检验。结果表明:(1)采用RME方法后,学生的数学推理能力的提高存在差异,中等类别的n增益值为55.5,低类别的n增益值为36.8,然后在t检验(独立)中得到控制班的Sig值。0.001<0.005,在独立样本t检验中决定。结果表明,RME方法与传统方法的学生在数学推理能力的平均分上存在显著差异。(2) RME方法对学生数学推理能力有影响,效应量得分为1.44,处于高水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信