{"title":"A New Procedure of One-Sided Test in Clinical Trials with Multiple Endpoints","authors":"Y. Nakazuru, T. Sozu, C. Hamada, I. Yoshimura","doi":"10.5691/JJB.35.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers clinical trials with multiple endpoints, in which the efficacy of a test treatment is confirmed only when the superiority of the test treatment to control is evidenced in at least 1 endpoint and non-inferiority is observed in the remaining endpoints. Perlman and Wu (2004) proposed a one-sided testing procedure that was adaptable to this type of trials. This paper proposes a modification of this procedure, in which the likelihood ratio test is replaced with another test similar to that proposed by Tang et al. (1989). The performance of the proposed procedure was examined through theoretical consideration and Monte Carlo simulations assuming normality and homoscedasticity. The simulation study demonstrated that the power of the proposed procedure was higher than that of the procedure proposed by Perlman and Wu; in this procedure, type I error rates are maintained within nominal significance levels unless primary endpoints are highly correlated.","PeriodicalId":365545,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of biometrics","volume":"341 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5691/JJB.35.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This paper considers clinical trials with multiple endpoints, in which the efficacy of a test treatment is confirmed only when the superiority of the test treatment to control is evidenced in at least 1 endpoint and non-inferiority is observed in the remaining endpoints. Perlman and Wu (2004) proposed a one-sided testing procedure that was adaptable to this type of trials. This paper proposes a modification of this procedure, in which the likelihood ratio test is replaced with another test similar to that proposed by Tang et al. (1989). The performance of the proposed procedure was examined through theoretical consideration and Monte Carlo simulations assuming normality and homoscedasticity. The simulation study demonstrated that the power of the proposed procedure was higher than that of the procedure proposed by Perlman and Wu; in this procedure, type I error rates are maintained within nominal significance levels unless primary endpoints are highly correlated.
本文考虑具有多终点的临床试验,其中只有在至少1个终点证明试验治疗优于对照,并且在其余终点观察到非劣效性时,才能确认试验治疗的疗效。Perlman和Wu(2004)提出了一种适用于这类试验的单侧检验程序。本文对这一过程进行了修改,将似然比检验改为类似于Tang et al.(1989)提出的检验。通过理论考虑和假设正态性和均方差的蒙特卡罗模拟来检验所提出程序的性能。仿真研究表明,该算法的求解能力高于Perlman和Wu算法;在此过程中,除非主要终点高度相关,否则I型错误率保持在名义显著性水平内。