{"title":"The EHMA Agora for seeking new paradigms","authors":"A. de Roo","doi":"10.1179/175330310X12883550540259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the opening session of the EHMA Annual Conference in Lahti, Finland, participants engaged in The Largo Simulation that instantly demonstrated the actuality of the conference theme: ‘Managing Radical Change in Health’. The simulation moderator, Laurie McMahon, confronted his audience with two major policy issues that will dominate health sector change in EU member states during the next decade. First, he raised the question about how to protect and improve health status in the face of the current recession. Public health research on previous economic crises has uncovered a broad range of negative effects on health and well-being, especially for lower socio-economic status groups. Second, he clarified the far-reaching consequences of the economic crisis on public funding of health services. EU governments are facing an unprecedented need to cut back budget deficits and national debts. As a consequence, they are looking for savings on health services expenditure on a scale not seen before. For example, the Dutch government is exploring opportunities to cut parts of its health sector budget by 20%. Other EU governments are looking for interventions of the same kind of magnitude. The health sector is used to financial pressure. Cost containment policies emerged in all Western countries during the 1980s, in reaction to a heavy economic recession and the extraordinary growth of health services expenditure in preceding years. Governments and health authorities filled a policy toolkit with instruments for restricting health service entitlements, refining need assessment procedures, slowing down capital investment, extending the range of co-payments, intervening in drugs price setting, tightening up macro budget control, and so on. During the last two decades the use of this toolkit intensified, as the growth rate of the publicly funded health sector tended to exceed domestic economic growth rate over and again. Under this pressure provider organizations have developed a broad repertoire of cost-saving routines to deal with recurrent budget cuts. These range from simply stopping waste, standardizing working procedures, and tightening financial control to measures to reduce labour costs and smarter procurement and utilization of buildings and equipment. Horizontal and vertical integration became a popular managerial option to pursue economies of scale and scope, as did substitution of cost-intensive clinical services for cheaper day treatment and ambulatory care. Efficiency became the buzz word that guided strategic actions on both the national and organizational levels. However, the present combination of growing health-care needs and macro-economic pressure on the sector requires strategic responses that go far beyond the conventional political and managerial routines of dealing with tight financial resources. This rapidly became visible for the participants participating in The Largo Simulation. First, everybody started to tackle the health and financial issues with solutions that had demonstrated their effectiveness in the past. Then, participants began to realize that the current socio-economic conditions imply a trend break with that past that strongly limits the effectiveness of those solutions. They recognized that out-of-the-box thinking is required to develop innovative responses to the changed circumstances. So they started to question the taken-for-granted values, principles and routines behind the organization and funding of health services. They questioned existing relationships between public funding, private payments, and charity. They explored the potential of radical patient self-management, of health operations management principles, and of redefining professional roles. They discussed the promises of prevention programmes and replacing organizational control by trust. Potential limits to equal access were reviewed as the development of unconventional sets of health insurance entitlements. They also considered the gains of replacing organizational hierarchy by","PeriodicalId":354315,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management & Marketing in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/175330310X12883550540259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
At the opening session of the EHMA Annual Conference in Lahti, Finland, participants engaged in The Largo Simulation that instantly demonstrated the actuality of the conference theme: ‘Managing Radical Change in Health’. The simulation moderator, Laurie McMahon, confronted his audience with two major policy issues that will dominate health sector change in EU member states during the next decade. First, he raised the question about how to protect and improve health status in the face of the current recession. Public health research on previous economic crises has uncovered a broad range of negative effects on health and well-being, especially for lower socio-economic status groups. Second, he clarified the far-reaching consequences of the economic crisis on public funding of health services. EU governments are facing an unprecedented need to cut back budget deficits and national debts. As a consequence, they are looking for savings on health services expenditure on a scale not seen before. For example, the Dutch government is exploring opportunities to cut parts of its health sector budget by 20%. Other EU governments are looking for interventions of the same kind of magnitude. The health sector is used to financial pressure. Cost containment policies emerged in all Western countries during the 1980s, in reaction to a heavy economic recession and the extraordinary growth of health services expenditure in preceding years. Governments and health authorities filled a policy toolkit with instruments for restricting health service entitlements, refining need assessment procedures, slowing down capital investment, extending the range of co-payments, intervening in drugs price setting, tightening up macro budget control, and so on. During the last two decades the use of this toolkit intensified, as the growth rate of the publicly funded health sector tended to exceed domestic economic growth rate over and again. Under this pressure provider organizations have developed a broad repertoire of cost-saving routines to deal with recurrent budget cuts. These range from simply stopping waste, standardizing working procedures, and tightening financial control to measures to reduce labour costs and smarter procurement and utilization of buildings and equipment. Horizontal and vertical integration became a popular managerial option to pursue economies of scale and scope, as did substitution of cost-intensive clinical services for cheaper day treatment and ambulatory care. Efficiency became the buzz word that guided strategic actions on both the national and organizational levels. However, the present combination of growing health-care needs and macro-economic pressure on the sector requires strategic responses that go far beyond the conventional political and managerial routines of dealing with tight financial resources. This rapidly became visible for the participants participating in The Largo Simulation. First, everybody started to tackle the health and financial issues with solutions that had demonstrated their effectiveness in the past. Then, participants began to realize that the current socio-economic conditions imply a trend break with that past that strongly limits the effectiveness of those solutions. They recognized that out-of-the-box thinking is required to develop innovative responses to the changed circumstances. So they started to question the taken-for-granted values, principles and routines behind the organization and funding of health services. They questioned existing relationships between public funding, private payments, and charity. They explored the potential of radical patient self-management, of health operations management principles, and of redefining professional roles. They discussed the promises of prevention programmes and replacing organizational control by trust. Potential limits to equal access were reviewed as the development of unconventional sets of health insurance entitlements. They also considered the gains of replacing organizational hierarchy by
在芬兰拉赫蒂举行的EHMA年会开幕式上,与会者参与了Largo模拟,该模拟立即展示了会议主题的现状:“管理健康的根本变化”。模拟主持人Laurie McMahon向听众提出了两个将在未来十年主导欧盟成员国卫生部门变革的主要政策问题。首先,他提出了在当前经济衰退的情况下如何保护和改善健康状况的问题。对以往经济危机的公共卫生研究揭示了对健康和福祉的广泛负面影响,特别是对社会经济地位较低的群体。第二,他澄清了经济危机对卫生服务公共资金的深远影响。欧盟各国政府正面临着削减预算赤字和国家债务的空前需要。因此,他们正在寻求以前所未有的规模节省卫生服务支出。例如,荷兰政府正在寻找机会将其卫生部门的部分预算削减20%。其他欧盟国家政府也在寻求同样规模的干预。卫生部门已经习惯了财政压力。20世纪80年代,所有西方国家都采取了成本控制政策,以应对严重的经济衰退和前几年保健服务支出的急剧增长。各国政府和卫生当局在政策工具箱中加入了限制卫生服务权利、完善需求评估程序、减缓资本投资、扩大共同支付范围、干预药品定价、加强宏观预算控制等工具。在过去二十年中,由于公共资助的卫生部门的增长率往往一再超过国内经济增长率,这一工具包的使用得到加强。在这种压力下,提供者组织制定了广泛的节省费用惯例,以应付经常预算的削减。这些措施包括简单地停止浪费、标准化工作程序和加强财务控制,以及降低劳动力成本和更智能地采购和利用建筑物和设备的措施。横向和纵向整合成为追求规模经济和范围经济的一种流行的管理选择,用成本密集的临床服务替代更便宜的日间治疗和门诊护理也是如此。效率成为指导国家和组织层面战略行动的流行语。然而,目前日益增长的保健需求和该部门面临的宏观经济压力,要求采取远远超出处理财政资源紧张的传统政治和管理惯例的战略对策。这一点在参与the Largo Simulation的参与者中迅速显现出来。首先,每个人都开始用过去证明有效的解决方案来解决健康和财务问题。然后,与会者开始认识到,目前的社会经济条件意味着一种与过去的趋势决裂,这种趋势严重限制了这些解决办法的效力。他们认识到,要对变化的环境作出创新的反应,就需要跳出常规思维。因此,他们开始质疑卫生服务组织和资助背后的理所当然的价值观、原则和惯例。他们质疑公共资金、私人支付和慈善机构之间现有的关系。他们探索了激进的病人自我管理、健康运作管理原则和重新定义专业角色的潜力。他们讨论了预防方案的承诺和以信任取代组织控制。随着非常规医疗保险应享权利的发展,对平等机会的潜在限制进行了审查。他们还考虑了用