Bots for Pull Requests: The Good, the Bad, and the Promising

M. Wessel, Ahmad Abdellatif, I. Wiese, T. Conte, Emad Shihab, M. Gerosa, Igor Steinmacher
{"title":"Bots for Pull Requests: The Good, the Bad, and the Promising","authors":"M. Wessel, Ahmad Abdellatif, I. Wiese, T. Conte, Emad Shihab, M. Gerosa, Igor Steinmacher","doi":"10.1145/3510003.3512765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software bots automate tasks within Open Source Software (OSS) projects' pull requests and save reviewing time and effort (“the good”). However, their interactions can be disruptive and noisy and lead to information overload (“the bad”). To identify strategies to overcome such problems, we applied Design Fiction as a participatory method with 32 practitioners. We elicited 22 design strategies for a bot mediator or the pull request user interface (“the promising”). Participants envisioned a separate place in the pull request interface for bot interactions and a bot mediator that can summarize and customize other bots' actions to mitigate noise. We also collected participants' perceptions about a prototype implementing the envisioned strategies. Our design strategies can guide the development of future bots and social coding platforms.","PeriodicalId":202896,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","volume":"150 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3510003.3512765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Software bots automate tasks within Open Source Software (OSS) projects' pull requests and save reviewing time and effort (“the good”). However, their interactions can be disruptive and noisy and lead to information overload (“the bad”). To identify strategies to overcome such problems, we applied Design Fiction as a participatory method with 32 practitioners. We elicited 22 design strategies for a bot mediator or the pull request user interface (“the promising”). Participants envisioned a separate place in the pull request interface for bot interactions and a bot mediator that can summarize and customize other bots' actions to mitigate noise. We also collected participants' perceptions about a prototype implementing the envisioned strategies. Our design strategies can guide the development of future bots and social coding platforms.
拉请求的机器人:好的,坏的和有希望的
软件机器人在开源软件(OSS)项目的拉取请求中自动执行任务,节省了审查的时间和精力(“好”)。然而,它们的交互可能是破坏性的和嘈杂的,并导致信息过载(“坏的”)。为了确定克服这些问题的策略,我们将设计小说作为一种参与式方法应用于32名实践者。我们引出了22种机器人中介或拉请求用户界面(“有前途的”)的设计策略。参与者设想在拉请求界面中为机器人交互和机器人中介提供一个单独的位置,可以总结和定制其他机器人的操作以减轻噪音。我们还收集了参与者对实现预期策略的原型的看法。我们的设计策略可以指导未来机器人和社交编码平台的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信