Judicial Reform and the European Court: Not a Numbers Game

K. Bradley
{"title":"Judicial Reform and the European Court: Not a Numbers Game","authors":"K. Bradley","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192846556.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Judicial Reform and the European Court: Not a Numbers Game examines the reforms, and major proposals for reform, of the European Union court. The most successful reforms have been initiated by the Court of Justice itself, concerned about its burgeoning workload, and have comprised either increasing the number of judges, or establishing a new judicial body competent at first instance for direct actions. The latter approach led first to the setting up of the General Court, and subsequently a specialized court. The Court has now changed tack, and the number of General Court judges has been doubled. To address the rising volume of preliminary ruling requests, an ‘EU Appeals’ procedure is proposed, allowing the Court of Justice largely to control its own workload. It would be a radical change, designed to break the mould before the mould breaks the system.","PeriodicalId":378313,"journal":{"name":"The Evolution of EU Law","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Evolution of EU Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846556.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Judicial Reform and the European Court: Not a Numbers Game examines the reforms, and major proposals for reform, of the European Union court. The most successful reforms have been initiated by the Court of Justice itself, concerned about its burgeoning workload, and have comprised either increasing the number of judges, or establishing a new judicial body competent at first instance for direct actions. The latter approach led first to the setting up of the General Court, and subsequently a specialized court. The Court has now changed tack, and the number of General Court judges has been doubled. To address the rising volume of preliminary ruling requests, an ‘EU Appeals’ procedure is proposed, allowing the Court of Justice largely to control its own workload. It would be a radical change, designed to break the mould before the mould breaks the system.
司法改革与欧洲法院:不是数字游戏
《司法改革与欧洲法院:不是数字游戏》考察了欧盟法院的改革和主要改革建议。最成功的改革是由法院本身发起的,涉及其日益增加的工作量,其中包括增加法官人数,或设立一个新的司法机构,负责一审直接诉讼。后一种办法首先导致设立一个普通法院,随后又设立一个专门法院。法院现在改变了方针,普通法院法官的人数增加了一倍。为了解决不断增加的初步裁决请求,提出了“欧盟上诉”程序,允许法院在很大程度上控制自己的工作量。这将是一次彻底的改变,旨在在模式打破系统之前打破模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信