Comprehensive Competitiveness Evaluation of China’s Four Big State-owned Banks——Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

Siqi Yu
{"title":"Comprehensive Competitiveness Evaluation of China’s Four Big State-owned Banks——Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process","authors":"Siqi Yu","doi":"10.1109/CBFD52659.2021.00042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to the latest ranking of TOP 1,000 World Banks 2020, the leading position of China’s four major banks have increased over their US counterparts: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) topped the list, followed by China Construction Bank (CCB) (No. 2), Agricultural Bank of China (ABOC) (No. 3) and Bank of China (BOC) (No. 4). Due to the influence of COVID-19, banks will come under more pressure as the result of the fiercer competition between them. Although the influence of Chinese banks in the world has increased, their comprehensive strength still needs to be improved. However, at present, there are relatively few academic evaluations on the comprehensive strength of Chinese banks, and the evaluation system is not perfect enough, and the evaluation indicators are not plentiful enough. Therefore, this paper analyses China’s four major state-owned banks’ data from 2015 to 2019 and establishe a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on the analytic hierarchy process. The final conclusion that is drawn by this paper is about the ranking of these four banks’ comprehensive competitiveness: the strongest is Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, followed by China Construction Bank and Bank of China, and the weakest one is Agricultural Bank of China. The evaluation systemof this paper verifies the rationality of the international ranking and has important reference significance for banks to understand their own status and enhance their comprehensive competitiveness.","PeriodicalId":230625,"journal":{"name":"2021 International Conference on Computer, Blockchain and Financial Development (CBFD)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 International Conference on Computer, Blockchain and Financial Development (CBFD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBFD52659.2021.00042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to the latest ranking of TOP 1,000 World Banks 2020, the leading position of China’s four major banks have increased over their US counterparts: Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC) topped the list, followed by China Construction Bank (CCB) (No. 2), Agricultural Bank of China (ABOC) (No. 3) and Bank of China (BOC) (No. 4). Due to the influence of COVID-19, banks will come under more pressure as the result of the fiercer competition between them. Although the influence of Chinese banks in the world has increased, their comprehensive strength still needs to be improved. However, at present, there are relatively few academic evaluations on the comprehensive strength of Chinese banks, and the evaluation system is not perfect enough, and the evaluation indicators are not plentiful enough. Therefore, this paper analyses China’s four major state-owned banks’ data from 2015 to 2019 and establishe a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on the analytic hierarchy process. The final conclusion that is drawn by this paper is about the ranking of these four banks’ comprehensive competitiveness: the strongest is Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, followed by China Construction Bank and Bank of China, and the weakest one is Agricultural Bank of China. The evaluation systemof this paper verifies the rationality of the international ranking and has important reference significance for banks to understand their own status and enhance their comprehensive competitiveness.
中国四大国有银行综合竞争力评价——基于层次分析法的模糊综合评价
根据最新的2020年世界银行1000强排名,中国四大银行的领先地位有所上升:中国工商银行(ICBC)位居榜首,其次是中国建设银行(CCB)(第二名),中国农业银行(ABOC)(第三名)和中国银行(BOC)(第四名)。受新冠肺炎疫情的影响,银行之间的竞争将更加激烈,压力将更大。虽然中国银行在国际上的影响力有所增强,但其综合实力仍有待提高。但目前学术界对我国银行综合实力的评价相对较少,评价体系不够完善,评价指标不够丰富。因此,本文对中国四大国有银行2015 - 2019年的数据进行分析,建立基于层次分析法的模糊综合评价模型。本文最后得出的结论是这四家银行的综合竞争力排名:最强的是中国工商银行,其次是中国建设银行和中国银行,最弱的是中国农业银行。本文的评价体系验证了国际排名的合理性,对银行了解自身状况,提升综合竞争力具有重要的参考意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信