A epidemia de más condutas na ciência: o fracasso do tratamento moralizador

Marcos Barbosa de Oliveira
{"title":"A epidemia de más condutas na ciência: o fracasso do tratamento moralizador","authors":"Marcos Barbosa de Oliveira","doi":"10.1590/S1678-31662015000400007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the proliferation of violations of ethical norms of science, that started to develop a few decades ago. It will be referred to as \"the epidemic\". The most important types of these violations are varieties of fraud (mainly falsification and fabrication of empirical data), and such forms of author misconduct as plagiarism, self-plagiarism, etc. The article is divided into six sections. In the first, the topic is introduced and some terminology clarified. In the second, evidence is presented which corroborates the existence of the epidemic. The third deals with the reaction to the epidemic, by characterizing its dynamics in terms of being dominated by conflict between two positions: the moralizing one - which promotes the application of the moralizing treatment to combat the epidemic; and the negationist one - which tends to deny the existence of the epidemic, and resists the moralizing measures. The fourth explores the causes of the epidemic. A distinction is introduced between productivism and productionism, and an analysis is proposed of the ways productivism fosters violations of ethical norms of science. The fifth consists of a critique of the moralizing treatment, based on its inadequacies, mainly its inefficacy. The conclusion points to an alternative to the moralizing treatment.","PeriodicalId":168872,"journal":{"name":"Scientiae Studia","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientiae Studia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662015000400007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The article deals with the proliferation of violations of ethical norms of science, that started to develop a few decades ago. It will be referred to as "the epidemic". The most important types of these violations are varieties of fraud (mainly falsification and fabrication of empirical data), and such forms of author misconduct as plagiarism, self-plagiarism, etc. The article is divided into six sections. In the first, the topic is introduced and some terminology clarified. In the second, evidence is presented which corroborates the existence of the epidemic. The third deals with the reaction to the epidemic, by characterizing its dynamics in terms of being dominated by conflict between two positions: the moralizing one - which promotes the application of the moralizing treatment to combat the epidemic; and the negationist one - which tends to deny the existence of the epidemic, and resists the moralizing measures. The fourth explores the causes of the epidemic. A distinction is introduced between productivism and productionism, and an analysis is proposed of the ways productivism fosters violations of ethical norms of science. The fifth consists of a critique of the moralizing treatment, based on its inadequacies, mainly its inefficacy. The conclusion points to an alternative to the moralizing treatment.
科学中不良行为的流行:道德治疗的失败
这篇文章讨论了几十年前开始出现的违反科学伦理规范的现象。它将被称为“流行病”。这些违规行为中最重要的类型是各种欺诈行为(主要是伪造和捏造经验数据),以及作者的不当行为,如抄袭、自我抄袭等。这篇文章分为六个部分。本文首先介绍了本文的主题,并对一些术语进行了澄清。在第二部分中,提出了证实这种流行病存在的证据。第三部分是关于对流行病的反应,描述了两种立场之间的冲突所主导的动态:道德化的一方提倡采用道德化的治疗方法来对抗流行病;而否定主义倾向于否认流行病的存在,并抵制道德措施。第四章探讨了艾滋病流行的原因。介绍了生产主义和生产主义之间的区别,并对生产主义助长违反科学伦理规范的方式进行了分析。第五部分是对道德化治疗的批判,基于它的不足,主要是它的无效。结论指出了道德治疗的另一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信