Solving Least Square Problem in Tomography

N. R. Jaffri, L. Shi, Usama Abrar
{"title":"Solving Least Square Problem in Tomography","authors":"N. R. Jaffri, L. Shi, Usama Abrar","doi":"10.1145/3406971.3409044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficacy of the tomographic process depends upon the image reconstruction. Utmost mathematical problems encounter in tomography are systems of large linear equations. Krylov solvers for linear systems have sophisticated and straightforward formulae for the residual norm. Two Krylov solvers CGLS and LSQR are the variations of steep descent. The steep descent is one of the fundamental iterative technique used exclusively for the solution of large sparse square matrices. However, CGLS and LSQR the variations of steep descent also solve least square problems. This work involves the comparison of CGLS and LSQR. CGLS and LSQR are mathematically equivalent, but LSQR is robust and difficult to apply. Large sparse linear least square problem solved by LSQR, that is Krylov space solver in-fact based on Lanczos's bidiagonalization. This work applies said variations (CGLS and LSQR) of the steep descent on a tomographic test problem and compare the two algorithms on the basis of accuracy using MATLAB.","PeriodicalId":111905,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Graphics and Signal Processing","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Graphics and Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3406971.3409044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The efficacy of the tomographic process depends upon the image reconstruction. Utmost mathematical problems encounter in tomography are systems of large linear equations. Krylov solvers for linear systems have sophisticated and straightforward formulae for the residual norm. Two Krylov solvers CGLS and LSQR are the variations of steep descent. The steep descent is one of the fundamental iterative technique used exclusively for the solution of large sparse square matrices. However, CGLS and LSQR the variations of steep descent also solve least square problems. This work involves the comparison of CGLS and LSQR. CGLS and LSQR are mathematically equivalent, but LSQR is robust and difficult to apply. Large sparse linear least square problem solved by LSQR, that is Krylov space solver in-fact based on Lanczos's bidiagonalization. This work applies said variations (CGLS and LSQR) of the steep descent on a tomographic test problem and compare the two algorithms on the basis of accuracy using MATLAB.
求解断层扫描中的最小二乘问题
层析成像的效果取决于图像的重建。在断层摄影中遇到的最大数学问题是大型线性方程组。线性系统的克雷洛夫解有复杂而直接的残差范数公式。两个Krylov解算器CGLS和LSQR是陡坡下降的变体。陡降法是求解大型稀疏方阵的基本迭代方法之一。然而,CGLS和LSQR的陡降变化也解决了最小二乘问题。这项工作涉及到CGLS和LSQR的比较。CGLS和LSQR在数学上是等价的,但LSQR具有鲁棒性,难以应用。用LSQR求解大型稀疏线性最小二乘问题,即基于Lanczos双对角化的Krylov空间求解器。本文将陡坡下降的CGLS和LSQR应用于一个层析测试问题,并在MATLAB的基础上比较了两种算法的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信