Archive as a Depository of Shared Memories, History and Identity

Viktorija Kudra Beroš
{"title":"Archive as a Depository of Shared Memories, History and Identity","authors":"Viktorija Kudra Beroš","doi":"10.11567/MET.36.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given their role in the preservation and protection of an authentic and credible trace of the past (documents) and, consequently, national identity, archives are considered places of choice for interpreting and representing shared memory and the past. Emphasising authenticity and credibility frames archives as seemingly neutral institutions in terms of politics and ideology. However, the trace that provides an insight into the “truth and knowledge” of our (individual and collective) past “that makes us what we are” needs to be questioned. Since the archiving procedure is based on the processes of inclusion and exclusion in all segments of everyday interpretation of material, the archive is a political and ideological institution that takes its place in the order of political power. This paper discusses the role of the archive as a place of preservation of “shared past and history” as an important part of national identity through the prism of institutional apparatuses or forms of knowledge/power (example of architecture) and technologies or manners of articulating and practising knowledge/power (example of everyday practice). The paper points to the role of archives in the (re)interpretation and (re)vision of shared memories, collective history and national identity on the examples of the Croatian State Archives and Archives of Yugoslavia, in the context of changes in the symbolic and political order (SFRY/Croatia). By constructing national memory and narratives of nationality through narratives of history and memory, and by constructing “truth” (knowledge) through exclusion and inclusion, archives (just like museums and libraries) have a role to play in “imagining” the community–nation. Or, according to the theory of performative identity (Foritier 2000), everyday practice that takes place in archives is an institutional identity practice that contributes to the unification and homogenisation of the community through a policy of interpretation by performing and producing (performative) memory (collective identity formation).","PeriodicalId":259479,"journal":{"name":"Migracijske i etničke teme / Migration and Ethnic Themes","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migracijske i etničke teme / Migration and Ethnic Themes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11567/MET.36.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given their role in the preservation and protection of an authentic and credible trace of the past (documents) and, consequently, national identity, archives are considered places of choice for interpreting and representing shared memory and the past. Emphasising authenticity and credibility frames archives as seemingly neutral institutions in terms of politics and ideology. However, the trace that provides an insight into the “truth and knowledge” of our (individual and collective) past “that makes us what we are” needs to be questioned. Since the archiving procedure is based on the processes of inclusion and exclusion in all segments of everyday interpretation of material, the archive is a political and ideological institution that takes its place in the order of political power. This paper discusses the role of the archive as a place of preservation of “shared past and history” as an important part of national identity through the prism of institutional apparatuses or forms of knowledge/power (example of architecture) and technologies or manners of articulating and practising knowledge/power (example of everyday practice). The paper points to the role of archives in the (re)interpretation and (re)vision of shared memories, collective history and national identity on the examples of the Croatian State Archives and Archives of Yugoslavia, in the context of changes in the symbolic and political order (SFRY/Croatia). By constructing national memory and narratives of nationality through narratives of history and memory, and by constructing “truth” (knowledge) through exclusion and inclusion, archives (just like museums and libraries) have a role to play in “imagining” the community–nation. Or, according to the theory of performative identity (Foritier 2000), everyday practice that takes place in archives is an institutional identity practice that contributes to the unification and homogenisation of the community through a policy of interpretation by performing and producing (performative) memory (collective identity formation).
档案作为共享记忆、历史和身份的存储
鉴于档案馆在保存和保护真实可信的过去痕迹(文件)以及因此而保护国家特性方面的作用,档案馆被认为是解释和代表共同记忆和过去的首选场所。强调真实性和可信性使档案馆在政治和意识形态方面成为看似中立的机构。然而,这些痕迹为我们(个人和集体)过去的“真相和知识”提供了一种洞察,“这使我们成为现在的样子”,需要受到质疑。由于档案程序是基于对日常材料解释的各个环节的包容和排斥的过程,档案是一种政治和意识形态的制度,它在政治权力的秩序中占有一席之地。本文通过制度装置或知识/权力形式(以建筑为例)以及表达和实践知识/权力的技术或方式(以日常实践为例)的棱镜,讨论了档案馆作为保存“共享的过去和历史”的地方作为国家认同的重要组成部分的作用。本文以克罗地亚国家档案馆和南斯拉夫档案馆为例,在象征和政治秩序(SFRY/克罗地亚)变化的背景下,指出档案在共同记忆、集体历史和民族认同的(重新)解释和(重新)愿景中的作用。档案馆(就像博物馆和图书馆一样)通过历史和记忆的叙事来建构民族记忆和民族性叙事,通过排斥和包容来建构“真相”(知识),在“想象”共同体国家中发挥作用。或者,根据表演性认同理论(Foritier 2000),在档案中发生的日常实践是一种制度性的认同实践,通过表演和产生(表演性)记忆(集体认同形成)的解释政策,有助于社区的统一和同质化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信