Project «Infiltration» or How to survive in the realm of shadows

A. Sukhno, V. Gulin
{"title":"Project «Infiltration» or How to survive in the realm of shadows","authors":"A. Sukhno, V. Gulin","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2020-30-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to change the perception of Hegel's Science of Logic as a classic work that has exclusively «historical» and «philosophical» value. The authors show that it reproduces an ambiguous intellectual situation, which indicates an internal discord in the structure of scientific utterance. This raises the question of the need for a specific action for an adequate reading of Hegel's text, capable of overcoming this ambiguity. The result of using such an action will be that it will remove the critical distance from the reader with respect to the Hegelian work, and will allow him to \"enter\" into it. This revolution in the perception of the classical philosophical text, according to the authors, should lead to its actualization.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox. Philosophical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2020-30-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to change the perception of Hegel's Science of Logic as a classic work that has exclusively «historical» and «philosophical» value. The authors show that it reproduces an ambiguous intellectual situation, which indicates an internal discord in the structure of scientific utterance. This raises the question of the need for a specific action for an adequate reading of Hegel's text, capable of overcoming this ambiguity. The result of using such an action will be that it will remove the critical distance from the reader with respect to the Hegelian work, and will allow him to "enter" into it. This revolution in the perception of the classical philosophical text, according to the authors, should lead to its actualization.
项目«渗透»或如何在阴影领域生存
本文的目的是改变人们对黑格尔的《逻辑学》是一部只具有“历史”和“哲学”价值的经典著作的看法。作者认为,它再现了一种模棱两可的智力状况,这表明科学话语结构的内部不和谐。这就提出了一个问题,即需要一个具体的行动来充分阅读黑格尔的文本,能够克服这种模糊性。使用这种行为的结果将是,它将消除读者对黑格尔作品的关键距离,并允许他“进入”其中。在作者看来,这种对古典哲学文本感知的革命应该导致它的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信