Domain Process Model Overcome Limitations of Engineering Models for Developing Artificial Intelligent Systems

Gary Langford, John Green, Daniel P. Burns, Alexander Keller, D. C. Schmidt
{"title":"Domain Process Model Overcome Limitations of Engineering Models for Developing Artificial Intelligent Systems","authors":"Gary Langford, John Green, Daniel P. Burns, Alexander Keller, D. C. Schmidt","doi":"10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The integrated set of prognostic domains (ISPD) of technology presented here provides a normative means to construct a wholly new process model for guiding Technology Management of Artificial Intelligent Systems (AIS). Seventeen domains represent all-inclusive stakeholder perspectives that encapsulate lifecycle analyses, evaluations, feasibilities, and tradeoffs with the domain contexts. Following Systems Model-Based thinking (SMBT), a postulated focal point interaction is the entry condition from which each domain is considered and thereafter traversed. Domains are interactive with each other through concurrent, iterative, recursive, and non-recursive processes. This interactive work continues until the completion milestones of each domain are satisfied. Techniques such as agile, progressive, prescriptive, and spiral are used as appropriate to reconcile functional and process requirements, risk, schedule, and budget. An important factor of ISPD is that multiple concepts of operation, widely diverse architectures, and explicitly differentiable designs are inevitable and highly desirable. The entire gamut of interactions of AIS with other posited systems is exposed and examined by the work carried out in each domain. While the ISPD was inspired by the use of SMBT with traditional process models, the essences of ISPD were extracted from developing systems of systems products and services. SMBT was piloted on a one-year project to integrate informational, social, and behavioral exchanges between humans and intelligent systems. This paper introduces SMBT for designing and building AIS by applying ISPD.","PeriodicalId":390110,"journal":{"name":"2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2019.8893881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The integrated set of prognostic domains (ISPD) of technology presented here provides a normative means to construct a wholly new process model for guiding Technology Management of Artificial Intelligent Systems (AIS). Seventeen domains represent all-inclusive stakeholder perspectives that encapsulate lifecycle analyses, evaluations, feasibilities, and tradeoffs with the domain contexts. Following Systems Model-Based thinking (SMBT), a postulated focal point interaction is the entry condition from which each domain is considered and thereafter traversed. Domains are interactive with each other through concurrent, iterative, recursive, and non-recursive processes. This interactive work continues until the completion milestones of each domain are satisfied. Techniques such as agile, progressive, prescriptive, and spiral are used as appropriate to reconcile functional and process requirements, risk, schedule, and budget. An important factor of ISPD is that multiple concepts of operation, widely diverse architectures, and explicitly differentiable designs are inevitable and highly desirable. The entire gamut of interactions of AIS with other posited systems is exposed and examined by the work carried out in each domain. While the ISPD was inspired by the use of SMBT with traditional process models, the essences of ISPD were extracted from developing systems of systems products and services. SMBT was piloted on a one-year project to integrate informational, social, and behavioral exchanges between humans and intelligent systems. This paper introduces SMBT for designing and building AIS by applying ISPD.
领域过程模型克服了开发人工智能系统的工程模型的局限性
本文提出的技术预测域集成集(ISPD)为构建一个全新的过程模型提供了一种规范手段,用于指导人工智能系统(AIS)的技术管理。17个领域代表了包含所有利益相关者的观点,这些观点封装了生命周期分析、评估、可行性,以及与领域上下文的权衡。遵循基于系统模型的思维(SMBT),假设的焦点交互是每个域被考虑并随后遍历的入口条件。域通过并发的、迭代的、递归的和非递归的过程相互交互。这种交互工作将继续进行,直到满足每个领域的完成里程碑。适当地使用敏捷、渐进、规范和螺旋等技术来协调功能和过程需求、风险、进度和预算。ISPD的一个重要因素是,多种操作概念、广泛多样的体系结构和明确可微分的设计是不可避免的,也是非常可取的。AIS与其他假定系统的整个交互范围暴露并通过在每个领域进行的工作进行检查。虽然ISPD的灵感来自传统过程模型中SMBT的使用,但ISPD的精髓是从开发系统产品和服务的系统中提取出来的。SMBT试点项目为期一年,旨在整合人类与智能系统之间的信息、社会和行为交流。本文介绍了应用ISPD设计和构建AIS系统的SMBT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信