Hur FAIR är svensk digitiserad kulturarvsdata idag?

Aron Ambrosiani, Åsa M Larsson
{"title":"Hur FAIR är svensk digitiserad kulturarvsdata idag?","authors":"Aron Ambrosiani, Åsa M Larsson","doi":"10.48202/24081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historical research is increasingly dependent on digital methods to find materials and information online. This requires a very different form of source criticism in order to understand what is available or not through different services. In this paper we present an overview of how digitalised heritage data from Swedish museums and archives are made publicly available on various platforms today, and highlight the often hidden challenges researchers face when trying to make use of them. The study is grounded in the FAIR data principles: to which extent is digitalised heritage data findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable? Content available through aggregated web services by the National Heritage Board, the National Archives and the Royal Library, among several others, are examined and compared. The published collections data of the Nordic Museum are used to highlight the limits of FAIR. We identify areas where lack of national strategies and good digital practices causes problems, and suggest ways forward. Digitalisation is much more than digital versions of analogue practices and materials. Trusted vocabularies combined with linked data and persistent identifiers will enable a richer and more multivocal heritage that is not restricted in space or to the information that fits onto a catalogue card. Researchers and heritage institutions need deeper collaboration to ensure digitalisation results in usable data, and they need to embrace good digital practices.","PeriodicalId":130945,"journal":{"name":"Lychnos: Årsbok för idé- och lärdomshistoria","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lychnos: Årsbok för idé- och lärdomshistoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48202/24081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Historical research is increasingly dependent on digital methods to find materials and information online. This requires a very different form of source criticism in order to understand what is available or not through different services. In this paper we present an overview of how digitalised heritage data from Swedish museums and archives are made publicly available on various platforms today, and highlight the often hidden challenges researchers face when trying to make use of them. The study is grounded in the FAIR data principles: to which extent is digitalised heritage data findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable? Content available through aggregated web services by the National Heritage Board, the National Archives and the Royal Library, among several others, are examined and compared. The published collections data of the Nordic Museum are used to highlight the limits of FAIR. We identify areas where lack of national strategies and good digital practices causes problems, and suggest ways forward. Digitalisation is much more than digital versions of analogue practices and materials. Trusted vocabularies combined with linked data and persistent identifiers will enable a richer and more multivocal heritage that is not restricted in space or to the information that fits onto a catalogue card. Researchers and heritage institutions need deeper collaboration to ensure digitalisation results in usable data, and they need to embrace good digital practices.
历史研究越来越依赖于数字方法在网上查找资料和信息。这需要一种非常不同形式的源批评,以便了解通过不同的服务哪些可用,哪些不可用。在本文中,我们概述了瑞典博物馆和档案馆的数字化遗产数据是如何在各种平台上公开提供的,并强调了研究人员在试图利用它们时经常面临的隐藏挑战。该研究以FAIR数据原则为基础:数字化遗产数据在多大程度上是可找到、可访问、可互操作和可重用的?国家文物局、国家档案馆和皇家图书馆以及其他几家机构通过聚合网络服务提供的内容被检查和比较。北欧博物馆公布的藏品数据被用来强调FAIR的局限性。我们确定了缺乏国家战略和良好数字实践导致问题的领域,并提出了前进的方向。数字化不仅仅是模拟实践和材料的数字版本。可信词汇表与链接数据和持久标识符相结合,将实现更丰富、更多样的遗产,而不受空间或目录卡信息的限制。研究人员和遗产机构需要更深入的合作,以确保数字化产生可用的数据,他们需要接受良好的数字化实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信