Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games

Jonne Arjoranta
{"title":"Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games","authors":"Jonne Arjoranta","doi":"10.31237/osf.io/uep74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital games are a relatively new medium. While they have been around for over half a century, they only became a major part of the culture relatively late. Like every other medium before, games also have struggled to find an expressive language of their own. Some of the expressive styles of other media are still relevant for games, but new ones have to be created specifically for videogames.This dissertation is a study of how ludonarrative videogames, videogames that combine game elements with narrative elements, express and convey meaning. This is done as part of game studies, a multidisciplinary approach to studying games. The purpose is twofold: to build a foundation for better understanding of meaning-making in games, and to provide game designers with tools for analyzing issues related to meaning.This study uses philosophical tools to analyze meaning in games. The philosophical hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer is used to compare the meaning-making in games to the interpretation of works of art. The theory of the interpretive process is based on the idea of the hermeneutic circle. Wittgenstein’s concept of language-games is used in examining how games should be defined and how their relations to each other should be understood. These philosophical methods are combined with the study of procedurality, narrativity and players.This study shows that ludonarrative games are procedural systems that are interpreted both during gameplay and as a part of the surrounding cultural context. The result of this interpretation is neither predetermined by the game designer nor fixed during gameplay, but potentially open for endless reinterpretation as players interact with the game in new ways and as the cultural context changes. In order to convey meaning, ludonarrative games can borrow expressive tools from other media, for example by using perspective in the way it is used in cinema.Additionally, this study provides guidelines for designing meaning. It is shown how meaning can be used as a game mechanic, and how games contain unique ways of expressing things that would be hard to convey in other media.","PeriodicalId":187868,"journal":{"name":"Jyväskylä studies in humanities","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jyväskylä studies in humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/uep74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Digital games are a relatively new medium. While they have been around for over half a century, they only became a major part of the culture relatively late. Like every other medium before, games also have struggled to find an expressive language of their own. Some of the expressive styles of other media are still relevant for games, but new ones have to be created specifically for videogames.This dissertation is a study of how ludonarrative videogames, videogames that combine game elements with narrative elements, express and convey meaning. This is done as part of game studies, a multidisciplinary approach to studying games. The purpose is twofold: to build a foundation for better understanding of meaning-making in games, and to provide game designers with tools for analyzing issues related to meaning.This study uses philosophical tools to analyze meaning in games. The philosophical hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer is used to compare the meaning-making in games to the interpretation of works of art. The theory of the interpretive process is based on the idea of the hermeneutic circle. Wittgenstein’s concept of language-games is used in examining how games should be defined and how their relations to each other should be understood. These philosophical methods are combined with the study of procedurality, narrativity and players.This study shows that ludonarrative games are procedural systems that are interpreted both during gameplay and as a part of the surrounding cultural context. The result of this interpretation is neither predetermined by the game designer nor fixed during gameplay, but potentially open for endless reinterpretation as players interact with the game in new ways and as the cultural context changes. In order to convey meaning, ludonarrative games can borrow expressive tools from other media, for example by using perspective in the way it is used in cinema.Additionally, this study provides guidelines for designing meaning. It is shown how meaning can be used as a game mechanic, and how games contain unique ways of expressing things that would be hard to convey in other media.
即时解释学:叙事数字游戏中的意义创造
数字游戏是一种相对较新的媒介。虽然它们已经存在了半个多世纪,但它们只是相对较晚才成为文化的重要组成部分。与之前的所有媒体一样,游戏也在努力寻找自己的表达语言。其他媒体的一些表达风格仍然适用于游戏,但必须为电子游戏创造新的表达风格。这篇论文是关于如何将游戏元素与叙事元素结合在一起的电子游戏来表达和传达意义的研究。这是游戏研究的一部分,是研究游戏的多学科方法。其目的有两个:为更好地理解游戏中的意义创造奠定基础,并为游戏设计师提供分析与意义相关问题的工具。本研究使用哲学工具来分析游戏中的意义。Hans-Georg Gadamer的哲学解释学被用来将游戏中的意义创造与艺术作品的解释进行比较。解释过程理论是建立在解释学循环思想的基础上的。维特根斯坦的语言游戏概念用于研究游戏应该如何定义,以及它们之间的关系应该如何理解。这些哲学方法与程序性、叙事性和玩家研究相结合。这项研究表明,游戏叙事游戏是一种程序系统,在游戏过程中被解读,并成为周围文化背景的一部分。这种解释的结果既不是由游戏设计师预先决定的,也不是在游戏过程中固定的,而是随着玩家以新的方式与游戏互动以及文化背景的变化而不断重新解释的可能性。为了传达意义,游戏叙事游戏可以借鉴其他媒体的表达工具,例如在电影中使用的视角。此外,本研究也为意义的设计提供了指导。它展示了如何将意义用作游戏机制,以及游戏如何包含难以在其他媒体中传达的独特表达方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信