Exploiting Chinese Interns As Unprotected Industrial Labor

Earl V. Brown, Kyle deCant
{"title":"Exploiting Chinese Interns As Unprotected Industrial Labor","authors":"Earl V. Brown, Kyle deCant","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2351270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-nationals with employees and contractors in the PRC confront the need to comply with an increasingly complex set of Chinese labor and employment laws and regulations. Many employers have chosen to rely on student interns, whom they treat as exempt from labor and employment law requirements, as a major source of workers for their factories and other facilities. Paid less than regular workers, but performing the same work with little to no educational enhancements, these “subminimum workers” are now a major source of industrial disruption. They have in recent years taken grievances about their treatment to the street, acting often as catalysts for strikes and disruptions in industry. In this article, we review the status of industrial interns under the 2008 Labor Contract Law, and related statutes and regulations, with an aim to examining whether the “intern” exemption from labor and employment law has any basis in the statutory and regulatory framework of current labor law, and whether it is a sound industrial practice to rely on large numbers of “subminimum” workers laboring alongside higher paid workers performing the same work in factories and other facilities, or in the service sector. We conclude that the “intern exemption” has little basis in the law, and is at odds with the policy of the 2008 labor and employment law reforms’ goal of protecting rights and promoting peaceful resolution of industrial disputes without strikes and slowdowns. We also explore whether, in those many factual situations where important credentials are contingent on completing the internship and intense pressure is exerted on students to sign up to meet employers’ “manpower” need, the practice amounts to forced labor under the ILO Conventions and other international law instruments.","PeriodicalId":177971,"journal":{"name":"Economic Perspectives on Employment & Labor Law eJournal","volume":"497 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Perspectives on Employment & Labor Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2351270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Multi-nationals with employees and contractors in the PRC confront the need to comply with an increasingly complex set of Chinese labor and employment laws and regulations. Many employers have chosen to rely on student interns, whom they treat as exempt from labor and employment law requirements, as a major source of workers for their factories and other facilities. Paid less than regular workers, but performing the same work with little to no educational enhancements, these “subminimum workers” are now a major source of industrial disruption. They have in recent years taken grievances about their treatment to the street, acting often as catalysts for strikes and disruptions in industry. In this article, we review the status of industrial interns under the 2008 Labor Contract Law, and related statutes and regulations, with an aim to examining whether the “intern” exemption from labor and employment law has any basis in the statutory and regulatory framework of current labor law, and whether it is a sound industrial practice to rely on large numbers of “subminimum” workers laboring alongside higher paid workers performing the same work in factories and other facilities, or in the service sector. We conclude that the “intern exemption” has little basis in the law, and is at odds with the policy of the 2008 labor and employment law reforms’ goal of protecting rights and promoting peaceful resolution of industrial disputes without strikes and slowdowns. We also explore whether, in those many factual situations where important credentials are contingent on completing the internship and intense pressure is exerted on students to sign up to meet employers’ “manpower” need, the practice amounts to forced labor under the ILO Conventions and other international law instruments.
剥削中国实习生作为不受保护的工业劳工
在中国拥有雇员和承包商的跨国公司需要遵守中国日益复杂的劳动和就业法律法规。许多雇主选择依靠学生实习生,因为他们认为这些人不受劳动和就业法的约束,是工厂和其他设施的主要工人来源。这些“次最低限度工人”的工资低于普通工人,但从事同样的工作,几乎没有受过教育,现在是工业中断的主要来源。近年来,他们对自己受到的待遇感到不满,走上街头,经常成为罢工和工业中断的催化剂。在本文中,我们回顾了2008年《劳动合同法》及其相关法律法规下的产业实习生的地位,旨在检验劳动用工法中的“实习生”豁免在现行劳动法的法律法规框架下是否有任何依据,以及依靠大量“次最低”工人与高薪工人在工厂和其他设施中从事相同工作是否是一种良好的产业实践。或者在服务业。我们的结论是,“实习生豁免”在法律上几乎没有依据,并且与2008年劳动和就业法改革的政策目标不一致,该政策的目标是保护权利,促进和平解决劳资纠纷,而不是罢工和减速。我们还探讨了在许多实际情况下,重要的证书取决于完成实习,并且学生为满足雇主的“人力”需求而对其施加巨大压力,这种做法是否构成国际劳工组织公约和其他国际法文书下的强迫劳动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信