The effect of institutional CSR on brand advocacy during COVID-19: the moderated mediation effect of CSR expectancy and value-driven motivation

Taeyoung Kim, Jing Yang, Myungok Chris Yim
{"title":"The effect of institutional CSR on brand advocacy during COVID-19: the moderated mediation effect of CSR expectancy and value-driven motivation","authors":"Taeyoung Kim, Jing Yang, Myungok Chris Yim","doi":"10.1108/jpbm-12-2020-3268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis research aims to understand consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) during an unprecedented public health crisis. Specifically, two studies were conducted to investigate how companies’ different CSR initiatives in the early stage of COVID-19 would influence consumers’ advocacy intention according to their focus (i.e. targets of institutional CSR). The first study examined the moderating role of individuals’ CSR expectancy on the effects of companies’ CSR initiatives on consumers’ brand advocacy intention. The second study further extends the findings of Study 1 by examining the mediating role of perceived brand motive.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTwo between-subject online experiments were conducted to explore the impact of three types of institutional CSR initiatives (i.e. community, employee and consumer-centered CSRs) on brand advocacy. Study 1 (N = 380) examined the moderating role of CSR expectancy in influencing consumer responses to institutional CSR initiatives. Study 2 (N = 384) explored the underlying mechanism through examining the mediating role of a company’s value-driven motivation in the process.\n\n\nFindings\nStudy 1 indicated that institutional CSR, regardless of type, was more effective in generating a more significant brand advocacy intention than a promotional message, measured as a baseline. The impact of different kinds of institutional CSR on consumers’ brand advocacy intentions was significantly moderated by their CSR-related expectations. Specifically, individuals with moderate to high CSR expectancy showed higher brand advocacy intentions in both consumer- and employee-centered CSR initiatives than the promotional message. In comparison, those with low CSR expectancy only showed higher brand advocacy intentions in the community-centered CSR initiative. In addition, as individuals’ CSR expectations rose, the mediation effect of the perceived value-driven motivation became stronger.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe current study includes guiding principles to help companies effectively respond to COVID-19 as corporate citizens by demonstrating the importance of individuals’ CSR expectancy across three CSR initiatives. This study used real-life examples of how leading companies were stepping up CSR efforts and suggested an approach that aligns CSR behaviors with the urgent and fundamental human needs of COVID-19.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIn line with the CSR goal of maximizing benefits for stakeholders, this study’s findings signal that situational changes determine CSR expectations and that companies must be highly susceptible to the changes in consumers’ expectations of CSR and their appraisal process of CSR motives to maximize its CSR value.\n","PeriodicalId":114857,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Product & Brand Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbm-12-2020-3268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This research aims to understand consumer responses to corporate social responsibility (CSR) during an unprecedented public health crisis. Specifically, two studies were conducted to investigate how companies’ different CSR initiatives in the early stage of COVID-19 would influence consumers’ advocacy intention according to their focus (i.e. targets of institutional CSR). The first study examined the moderating role of individuals’ CSR expectancy on the effects of companies’ CSR initiatives on consumers’ brand advocacy intention. The second study further extends the findings of Study 1 by examining the mediating role of perceived brand motive. Design/methodology/approach Two between-subject online experiments were conducted to explore the impact of three types of institutional CSR initiatives (i.e. community, employee and consumer-centered CSRs) on brand advocacy. Study 1 (N = 380) examined the moderating role of CSR expectancy in influencing consumer responses to institutional CSR initiatives. Study 2 (N = 384) explored the underlying mechanism through examining the mediating role of a company’s value-driven motivation in the process. Findings Study 1 indicated that institutional CSR, regardless of type, was more effective in generating a more significant brand advocacy intention than a promotional message, measured as a baseline. The impact of different kinds of institutional CSR on consumers’ brand advocacy intentions was significantly moderated by their CSR-related expectations. Specifically, individuals with moderate to high CSR expectancy showed higher brand advocacy intentions in both consumer- and employee-centered CSR initiatives than the promotional message. In comparison, those with low CSR expectancy only showed higher brand advocacy intentions in the community-centered CSR initiative. In addition, as individuals’ CSR expectations rose, the mediation effect of the perceived value-driven motivation became stronger. Research limitations/implications The current study includes guiding principles to help companies effectively respond to COVID-19 as corporate citizens by demonstrating the importance of individuals’ CSR expectancy across three CSR initiatives. This study used real-life examples of how leading companies were stepping up CSR efforts and suggested an approach that aligns CSR behaviors with the urgent and fundamental human needs of COVID-19. Originality/value In line with the CSR goal of maximizing benefits for stakeholders, this study’s findings signal that situational changes determine CSR expectations and that companies must be highly susceptible to the changes in consumers’ expectations of CSR and their appraisal process of CSR motives to maximize its CSR value.
新型冠状病毒肺炎期间机构企业社会责任对品牌宣传的影响:社会责任期望和价值驱动动机的调节中介效应
目的本研究旨在了解在前所未有的公共卫生危机中消费者对企业社会责任(CSR)的反应。具体而言,我们进行了两项研究,以调查企业在COVID-19早期不同的社会责任举措如何根据其关注的焦点(即机构社会责任的目标)影响消费者的倡导意愿。第一项研究考察了个人的社会责任期望对企业社会责任举措对消费者品牌倡导意愿的影响的调节作用。第二项研究通过考察感知品牌动机的中介作用,进一步扩展了研究1的研究结果。设计/方法/方法进行了两个受试者之间的在线实验,以探索三种类型的机构企业社会责任举措(即以社区、员工和消费者为中心的企业社会责任)对品牌倡导的影响。研究1 (N = 380)检验了社会责任期望在影响消费者对机构社会责任举措反应中的调节作用。研究2 (N = 384)通过考察公司价值驱动动机在这一过程中的中介作用,探索其深层机制。研究结果1表明,机构企业社会责任,无论类型如何,在产生更重要的品牌倡导意图方面比促销信息更有效,作为基线测量。不同类型机构企业社会责任对消费者品牌倡导意愿的影响被消费者的企业社会责任相关期望显著调节。具体而言,企业社会责任期望中高的个体在以消费者为中心和以员工为中心的企业社会责任行动中,都表现出比促销信息更高的品牌宣传意愿。相比之下,企业社会责任期望较低的企业在以社区为中心的企业社会责任行动中仅表现出较高的品牌宣传意愿。此外,随着个体社会责任期望的升高,感知价值驱动动机的中介作用越来越强。目前的研究包括指导原则,以帮助企业作为企业公民有效地应对COVID-19,通过展示个人的社会责任期望在三个社会责任计划中的重要性。本研究利用现实生活中的例子,展示了领先企业如何加强企业社会责任努力,并提出了一种将企业社会责任行为与COVID-19人类紧迫和基本需求相结合的方法。与利益相关者利益最大化的企业社会责任目标一致,本研究的发现表明,情境变化决定了企业社会责任期望,企业必须高度敏感于消费者对企业社会责任期望的变化及其对企业社会责任动机的评估过程,以实现企业社会责任价值最大化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信