Hong Kong Electoral Law with English Roots: Rethinking The Simplistic Approach to Relief from Penalty for Excusable Illegal Conduct in Lam Pok v Lee Hin Long [2021] HKCFI 779

K. Wong
{"title":"Hong Kong Electoral Law with English Roots: Rethinking The Simplistic Approach to Relief from Penalty for Excusable Illegal Conduct in Lam Pok v Lee Hin Long [2021] HKCFI 779","authors":"K. Wong","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2087361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. At the height of the pro-democracy protests in November 2019, Hong Kong witnessed a historic turnout of 71.23%, amongst more than four million eligible voters, in the District Councils elections, in a de facto referendum on the legitimacy or otherwise of the Beijing and Hong Kong Governments. The pro-Beijing camp suffered what many considered a humiliating defeat, winning only 62 seats out of the 452 that were directly elected. Whilst commanding overwhelming public support, many of the newly elected pro-democracy District Councillors had been first-time candidates all but completely new to electoral politics, and understandably unfamiliar with the elaborate regime of election laws in Hong Kong. Pro-Beijing politicians have, no doubt also understandably, been keen to seize on procedural irregularities in their opponents’ campaigns and challenge their seats by way of election petitions, which are invariably assigned to the Constitutional and Administrative Law List of the High Court of Hong Kong.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"128 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2087361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. At the height of the pro-democracy protests in November 2019, Hong Kong witnessed a historic turnout of 71.23%, amongst more than four million eligible voters, in the District Councils elections, in a de facto referendum on the legitimacy or otherwise of the Beijing and Hong Kong Governments. The pro-Beijing camp suffered what many considered a humiliating defeat, winning only 62 seats out of the 452 that were directly elected. Whilst commanding overwhelming public support, many of the newly elected pro-democracy District Councillors had been first-time candidates all but completely new to electoral politics, and understandably unfamiliar with the elaborate regime of election laws in Hong Kong. Pro-Beijing politicians have, no doubt also understandably, been keen to seize on procedural irregularities in their opponents’ campaigns and challenge their seats by way of election petitions, which are invariably assigned to the Constitutional and Administrative Law List of the High Court of Hong Kong.
《香港选举法的英文渊源:林柏诉李显龙案中可原谅违法行为的减刑方法再思考》[2021][HKCFI] 779
1. 在2019年11月民主抗议活动最激烈的时候,在400多万合格选民中,香港区议会选举的投票率达到了历史性的71.23%,这实际上是对北京和香港政府合法性的公投。亲北京阵营遭受了许多人认为是耻辱性的失败,在直接选举的452个席位中只赢得62个席位。虽然获得了压倒性的公众支持,但许多新当选的民主派区议员都是首次参选,对选举政治几乎完全陌生,对香港复杂的选举法制度也不熟悉,这是可以理解的。亲北京的政客们热衷于抓住对手竞选活动中的程序违规之处,并通过选举请愿的方式挑战他们的席位,这无疑也是可以理解的,这些请愿总是被分配到香港高等法院的宪制及行政法名册上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信