Quo vadis nano-CMOS ?

T. Skotnicki
{"title":"Quo vadis nano-CMOS ?","authors":"T. Skotnicki","doi":"10.1109/IWNC.2006.4570995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When I was a student, 25 years ago, one of the hypotheses was that intelligence would appear spontaneously once complexity and speed of a logic system exceed a given level. In the span of last 25 years the CMOS switching frequency has increased X50, the number of transistors per chip X1000, whereas the transistor feature size has decreased X32. In spite of that extraordinary progress, our computers seem all but intelligent. Does it mean that we are still below this magic complexity level? Maybe, but taking into account that CMOS is already today a genuine Nano-technology, there is little room left for improvement. Therefore, will intelligence appear within the remaining 3 or so generations before Nano-CMOS hits the atomic limit? Or maybe we should admit that transistor performance is no longer a key, and targets for CMOS technologies should be refined? If so, what is then THE nano-device we should seek? What is THE nano-technology we should target? In this paper we will deliberate on these and relevant questions (hardly answering ANY).","PeriodicalId":356139,"journal":{"name":"2006 International Workshop on Nano CMOS","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 International Workshop on Nano CMOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWNC.2006.4570995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When I was a student, 25 years ago, one of the hypotheses was that intelligence would appear spontaneously once complexity and speed of a logic system exceed a given level. In the span of last 25 years the CMOS switching frequency has increased X50, the number of transistors per chip X1000, whereas the transistor feature size has decreased X32. In spite of that extraordinary progress, our computers seem all but intelligent. Does it mean that we are still below this magic complexity level? Maybe, but taking into account that CMOS is already today a genuine Nano-technology, there is little room left for improvement. Therefore, will intelligence appear within the remaining 3 or so generations before Nano-CMOS hits the atomic limit? Or maybe we should admit that transistor performance is no longer a key, and targets for CMOS technologies should be refined? If so, what is then THE nano-device we should seek? What is THE nano-technology we should target? In this paper we will deliberate on these and relevant questions (hardly answering ANY).
25年前,当我还是一名学生时,其中一个假设是,一旦逻辑系统的复杂性和速度超过给定水平,智能就会自发出现。在过去的25年里,CMOS开关频率增加了X50,每个芯片的晶体管数量增加了X1000,而晶体管的特征尺寸减少了X32。尽管取得了非凡的进步,但我们的计算机似乎还不够智能。这是否意味着我们仍然低于这个神奇的复杂性水平?也许吧,但是考虑到CMOS今天已经是一种真正的纳米技术,没有什么改进的空间了。因此,在纳米cmos达到原子极限之前,智能是否会在剩下的3代左右出现?或者我们应该承认晶体管性能不再是关键,CMOS技术的目标应该被改进?如果是这样,那么我们应该寻找的纳米器件是什么呢?我们应该瞄准的纳米技术是什么?在本文中,我们将讨论这些和相关问题(几乎不回答任何问题)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信