Validity of activity measurement using a smart phone

A. Hammoud, R. Jaber, H. Othman
{"title":"Validity of activity measurement using a smart phone","authors":"A. Hammoud, R. Jaber, H. Othman","doi":"10.1109/ICABME.2017.8167520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since smart phones are equipped with built-in accelerometers they can be used for self-monitoring of physical activity which is an important health behavior and predictor of functioning, especially in older adults. The objective of this study is to investigate the validity of a smart phone-based activity monitoring application in adults aged below and above 65 years old. Ten adults aged below 65 years (mean of 33, standard deviation 13.7) and ten adults aged 65 years or older (mean 76, standard deviation 5.5) were asked to monitor their daily physical activity with a smart phone and an ActiGraph GT3X for 7 consecutive days. Spearman correlations between the counts per minute of the two devices were calculated for adults aged below and above 65 years separately. For both devices, each monitored minute was classified into four categories of activity intensity based on the counts per minute: sedentary, light, moderate, and high activity intensity. Association and agreement between the two devices was analyzed for separately for the two groups using Pearson's Correlations and paired t-tests. Data from 10 adults aged below 65 years and 10 adults aged above 65 years could be included in the analyses. Spearman correlations in adults aged below 65 years varied between 0.62 and 0.89 and correlations in adults aged above 65 years varied between 0.73 and 0.98. Pearson's correlations between the two devices for total number of minutes spent in different activity intensity categories per day per participant were high in both groups (range 0.79–0.98). Paired t-tests revealed that the smart phone underestimates the number of sedentary minutes per day in participants aged below and above 65 years with 6.45% and 6.78% respectively.","PeriodicalId":426559,"journal":{"name":"2017 Fourth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Fourth International Conference on Advances in Biomedical Engineering (ICABME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICABME.2017.8167520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Since smart phones are equipped with built-in accelerometers they can be used for self-monitoring of physical activity which is an important health behavior and predictor of functioning, especially in older adults. The objective of this study is to investigate the validity of a smart phone-based activity monitoring application in adults aged below and above 65 years old. Ten adults aged below 65 years (mean of 33, standard deviation 13.7) and ten adults aged 65 years or older (mean 76, standard deviation 5.5) were asked to monitor their daily physical activity with a smart phone and an ActiGraph GT3X for 7 consecutive days. Spearman correlations between the counts per minute of the two devices were calculated for adults aged below and above 65 years separately. For both devices, each monitored minute was classified into four categories of activity intensity based on the counts per minute: sedentary, light, moderate, and high activity intensity. Association and agreement between the two devices was analyzed for separately for the two groups using Pearson's Correlations and paired t-tests. Data from 10 adults aged below 65 years and 10 adults aged above 65 years could be included in the analyses. Spearman correlations in adults aged below 65 years varied between 0.62 and 0.89 and correlations in adults aged above 65 years varied between 0.73 and 0.98. Pearson's correlations between the two devices for total number of minutes spent in different activity intensity categories per day per participant were high in both groups (range 0.79–0.98). Paired t-tests revealed that the smart phone underestimates the number of sedentary minutes per day in participants aged below and above 65 years with 6.45% and 6.78% respectively.
使用智能手机测量活动的有效性
由于智能手机配备了内置的加速度计,它们可以用于自我监测身体活动,这是一项重要的健康行为和功能预测指标,尤其是在老年人中。本研究的目的是调查基于智能手机的活动监测应用程序在65岁以下和65岁以上成年人中的有效性。要求10名65岁以下的成年人(平均33岁,标准差13.7)和10名65岁及以上的成年人(平均76岁,标准差5.5)使用智能手机和ActiGraph GT3X连续7天监测他们的日常身体活动。对65岁以下和65岁以上的成年人分别计算了两种设备每分钟计数之间的斯皮尔曼相关性。对于这两种设备,每监测一分钟的活动强度根据每分钟的计数分为四类:久坐、轻度、中度和高活动强度。使用Pearson’s correlation和配对t检验分别分析两组设备之间的关联和一致性。来自10名65岁以下的成年人和10名65岁以上的成年人的数据可以纳入分析。65岁以下成年人的Spearman相关性在0.62 - 0.89之间变化,65岁以上成年人的Spearman相关性在0.73 - 0.98之间变化。两组参与者每天在不同活动强度类别中花费的总分钟数在两种设备之间的Pearson相关性都很高(范围为0.79-0.98)。配对t检验显示,智能手机低估了65岁以下和65岁以上参与者每天久坐的时间,分别为6.45%和6.78%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信