Why Do Firms in India Pay Dividend in Presence of Firm Level Dividend Distribution Tax ? - An Agency Theory Based Explanation.

Debabrata Datta, Santanu K. Ganguli, Manu Chaturvedi
{"title":"Why Do Firms in India Pay Dividend in Presence of Firm Level Dividend Distribution Tax ? - An Agency Theory Based Explanation.","authors":"Debabrata Datta, Santanu K. Ganguli, Manu Chaturvedi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2189366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of the study is to analyze motivation behind payment of cash dividend by the firms in India in presence of tax provision that discourages payment of dividend by imposing tax on firms at the time of distribution. Design/methodology/approach First, consistent with Jensen’s (1986) view, the paper presents a theoretical model that shows - dividend payout addresses agency problem of free cash flow and then, empirically highlights through event study and OLS regression - the impact of stock price reaction to dividend increase and decrease in respect of 352 announcements during 2006-10 of top 100 companies listed in Bombay stock exchange (BSE). Findings: As predicted by the model, empirical results show that despite adverse tax provision resulting in depletion of shareholder’ wealth upon dividend distribution - high payout announcement causes rise in valuation and low pay out has just an opposite impact for stable, profitable, mature and high value firms that hardly need ‘dividend signaling’ to address information asymmetry problem as to their worth. Despite tax disadvantage, investors prefer and value dividend as it mitigates agency problem of retention. The finding is consistent with ‘life cycle theory’s prediction of high pay out by large and profitable firms. Practical Implication: The corporate managers of India, oblivious of the hidden agency cost associated with high retention, are conservative in setting their dividend policy, perhaps attributable to dividend tax – a direct cost of distribution. The findings of the study may encourage the CFOs and finance executives to have a relook at their existing dividend policy. At macro level as well, the fiscal policy makers should revisit the dividend distribution tax in its present form because of its potential of inefficient build up and use of resources through retention at firm level. Originality/ value: The findings of the study enrich the literature on agency theory and dividend policy formulation at micro level and to an extent public finance at macro level as well.","PeriodicalId":228141,"journal":{"name":"India Law eJournal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2189366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to analyze motivation behind payment of cash dividend by the firms in India in presence of tax provision that discourages payment of dividend by imposing tax on firms at the time of distribution. Design/methodology/approach First, consistent with Jensen’s (1986) view, the paper presents a theoretical model that shows - dividend payout addresses agency problem of free cash flow and then, empirically highlights through event study and OLS regression - the impact of stock price reaction to dividend increase and decrease in respect of 352 announcements during 2006-10 of top 100 companies listed in Bombay stock exchange (BSE). Findings: As predicted by the model, empirical results show that despite adverse tax provision resulting in depletion of shareholder’ wealth upon dividend distribution - high payout announcement causes rise in valuation and low pay out has just an opposite impact for stable, profitable, mature and high value firms that hardly need ‘dividend signaling’ to address information asymmetry problem as to their worth. Despite tax disadvantage, investors prefer and value dividend as it mitigates agency problem of retention. The finding is consistent with ‘life cycle theory’s prediction of high pay out by large and profitable firms. Practical Implication: The corporate managers of India, oblivious of the hidden agency cost associated with high retention, are conservative in setting their dividend policy, perhaps attributable to dividend tax – a direct cost of distribution. The findings of the study may encourage the CFOs and finance executives to have a relook at their existing dividend policy. At macro level as well, the fiscal policy makers should revisit the dividend distribution tax in its present form because of its potential of inefficient build up and use of resources through retention at firm level. Originality/ value: The findings of the study enrich the literature on agency theory and dividend policy formulation at micro level and to an extent public finance at macro level as well.
为什么印度公司在征收公司级股息分配税的情况下还要支付股息?——基于代理理论的解释。
目的:本研究的目的是分析印度公司在存在税收规定的情况下支付现金股息的动机,这些规定通过在分配时对公司征税来阻止股息支付。设计/方法/方法首先,与Jensen(1986)的观点一致,本文提出了一个理论模型,该模型表明股息支付解决了自由现金流的代理问题,然后,通过事件研究和OLS回归,实证地强调了2006-10年期间孟买证券交易所(BSE)前100家上市公司的352个公告的股价反应对股息增减的影响。研究发现:正如模型预测的那样,实证结果表明,尽管不利的税收规定导致股东财富在股息分配时枯竭,但对于稳定、盈利、成熟和高价值的公司来说,高派息公告导致估值上升,而低派息则恰恰相反,这些公司几乎不需要“股息信号”来解决其价值的信息不对称问题。尽管存在税收劣势,但投资者更青睐和重视股息,因为它缓解了留存的代理问题。这一发现与“生命周期理论”对大型盈利公司高薪酬的预测是一致的。实践启示:印度的公司管理者,无视与高留存相关的隐性代理成本,在制定股息政策时是保守的,这可能归因于股息税——一种直接的分配成本。研究结果可能会鼓励首席财务官和财务高管重新审视他们现有的股息政策。在宏观层面上,财政政策制定者也应该重新审视目前形式的股息分配税,因为它有可能通过企业层面的保留而低效地积累和使用资源。原创性/价值:研究结果在微观层面丰富了代理理论和股利政策制定方面的文献,在宏观层面也丰富了公共财政方面的文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信