Regulating the Cloud: A Comparative Analysis of the Current and Proposed Privacy Frameworks in Canada and the European Union

David Krebs
{"title":"Regulating the Cloud: A Comparative Analysis of the Current and Proposed Privacy Frameworks in Canada and the European Union","authors":"David Krebs","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1898169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud computing is a growing phenomenon and promises greater efficiency and reduced-cost computing. However, some of the basic technological and business-related features of the Cloud are at odds with personal data protection laws. Canada and the European Union share similar core values related to privacy/data protection, and both regions aim to increase their competitiveness regarding cloud computing. Having these two similarities in mind, this paper explores the current legal and stakeholder landscape in Canada and the European Union with respect to cloud computing, data protection and how adoption of the model can be advanced. The analysis shows that neither of the frameworks is entirely compatible with cloud computing in its current application. Canada's legal landscape is slightly more hospitable, but is lacking direction from regulators, while the EU's non-harmonized and restrictive framework presents a challenge for cloud proliferation. Relevant stakeholders have diverging views on how data protection in the Cloud should be approached and 2012 will be a year during which these views will likely be debated in detail, in particular in response to the proposal of the European Commission on a new data protection framework. This paper concludes with distilling four possible options in this regard. Official version available in The Canadian Journal of Law and Technology: (2012) 10 C.J.L.T. 29 (Carswell).","PeriodicalId":263812,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Law and Technology","volume":"592 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Law and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1898169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Cloud computing is a growing phenomenon and promises greater efficiency and reduced-cost computing. However, some of the basic technological and business-related features of the Cloud are at odds with personal data protection laws. Canada and the European Union share similar core values related to privacy/data protection, and both regions aim to increase their competitiveness regarding cloud computing. Having these two similarities in mind, this paper explores the current legal and stakeholder landscape in Canada and the European Union with respect to cloud computing, data protection and how adoption of the model can be advanced. The analysis shows that neither of the frameworks is entirely compatible with cloud computing in its current application. Canada's legal landscape is slightly more hospitable, but is lacking direction from regulators, while the EU's non-harmonized and restrictive framework presents a challenge for cloud proliferation. Relevant stakeholders have diverging views on how data protection in the Cloud should be approached and 2012 will be a year during which these views will likely be debated in detail, in particular in response to the proposal of the European Commission on a new data protection framework. This paper concludes with distilling four possible options in this regard. Official version available in The Canadian Journal of Law and Technology: (2012) 10 C.J.L.T. 29 (Carswell).
规范云:加拿大和欧盟现行和拟议隐私框架的比较分析
云计算是一种不断发展的现象,它承诺更高的效率和更低的计算成本。然而,云的一些基本技术和与业务相关的功能与个人数据保护法不一致。加拿大和欧盟在隐私/数据保护方面有着相似的核心价值观,这两个地区都致力于提高其在云计算方面的竞争力。考虑到这两个相似之处,本文探讨了加拿大和欧盟在云计算、数据保护以及如何采用该模型方面的当前法律和利益相关者环境。分析表明,这两个框架在其当前应用中都不能完全兼容云计算。加拿大的法律环境稍微友好一些,但缺乏监管机构的指导,而欧盟的不协调和限制性框架对云计算的扩散提出了挑战。有关的利益相关者对如何处理云中的数据保护有不同的看法,2012年将是这些观点可能会进行详细辩论的一年,特别是在回应欧盟委员会关于新的数据保护框架的建议时。本文总结了这方面的四种可能的选择。《加拿大法律与技术杂志》(2012)10 C.J.L.T. 29(卡斯维尔)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信